Live data from Hacker News

The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

conic.al

11–20 of 209 posts

Re: The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

#12
post #9

You can't seriously match people on first and last name and claim "fully matched". Think of how manny John Smiths there are? How can this be the company started by Wozniak and Jobs ...

As a guy named Chris Smith, I can tell you, people do absolutely "match people on first and last name", and it causes me no end of trouble.

They do unfortunately. I know someone with a more unusual surname who was getting chased for the debt of someone with the same name. It happens.

Re: The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

#13
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is trading one problem for another: when the name on your birth certificate doesn't match the name on your government issued ID, certain other government entities tend to deny you services.

I would think that changing the last name only should be fine though, since up until somewhat recently, most women changed their last names when they got married, so most systems should be equipped to handle this.

It used to be very common for migrants to change their surnames, although less so now. There used to be a person who wrote about Scottish Lithuanians called John Millar, who was born as Jonas Stepšys. Noam Chomsky had said that his family's surname was substantially altered after they went to the USA.

Re: The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

#14
post #3

Honestly the best thing to do might be to change your name at this point. I'm glad my name is not common, this kind of issue is going to only get worse in the future.

I get phone calls for a guy named Randy about his business. I can’t for the life of me figure out how to make the phone calls stop.

The simplest solution is to change my phone number. But

a) why should I have to? it’s my number, dammit!

b) how many accounts have 2FA? if I changed my number, what if I miss updating one that’s important?

c) it could happen again

If I change my number, however, that is the simplest way to solve the problem. It’s just, do I want to?

Re: The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

#15
post #2

Something like this happened to me and it has cost me $20k+ over time, https://areoform.wordpress.com/2021/08/06/on-apples-expanded... Mercury unblocked my accounts because their founder is a very kind man who bothered to verify what the document actually says rather than falling back to, "Computer says no." But everywhere else? De nada. Computer says no. And it's not even me. It's a fuzzy match with someone in their…

"The evil, I can tolerate; but the stupidity..." -Hubert Farnsworth

Re: The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

#18
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a guy named Chris Smith, I can tell you, people do absolutely "match people on first and last name", and it causes me no end of trouble.

They do unfortunately. I know someone with a more unusual surname who was getting chased for the debt of someone with the same name. It happens.

[deleted]

Re: The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would think that changing the last name only should be fine though, since up until somewhat recently, most women changed their last names when they got married, so most systems should be equipped to handle this.

It used to be very common for migrants to change their surnames, although less so now. There used to be a person who wrote about Scottish Lithuanians called John Millar, who was born as Jonas Stepšys. Noam Chomsky had said that his family's surname was substantially altered after they went to the USA.

And older example: Warner brothers were born as Wonsal (or Wonskolaser), and they changed their names too (Hirsz became Harry, Aaron became Albert).

Re: The other Sean Byrne doesn't exist

#20

You can't seriously match people on first and last name and claim "fully matched". Think of how manny John Smiths there are? How can this be the company started by Wozniak and Jobs ...

You’re presenting this like a mistake born out of incompetence.

It isn’t. The institutions involved simply don’t care whether they are destroying the lives of random people. At all.

And why should they? They are completely unaccountable in practice, sometimes even in theory.

Post reply on HN