Live data from Hacker News

Qwen 3.8 27B

huggingface.co

681–690 of 848 posts

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#681

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd love to understand this more. Are you saying the Qwen team spends their very impressive human and compute resources on publishing these amazing models and then botches the chat template with mundane bugs? Like maybe I just misunderstand what's the hard part but wouldn't you assume that people who can put together an impressive model can also write a proper jinja chat template for it?

You have understood correctly. One really would think these companies (including Google) who spend many millions of dollars on compute could write a few hundred lines of Jinja correctly, so their investment works optimally or at all. But they don't. Then a couple of individuals on HuggingFace fix it, either a 2-person startup like Unsloth or a volunteer like froggeric. I also don't understand how this repeatedly happ…

I did SFT / RL post-training on Qwen3 models a bit. This is an issue that dates back long ago.

My favorite theory is that they had many model variants internally, each using a slightly different chat template, so when it comes to the release they are not even sure what to use any more.

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#682

If anyone else is running this on an RTX 5090, https://github.com/Neroued/ninfer as inference engine gets me ~138 tokens/second, roughly double what I get with a naive llama.cpp setup.

It there anything similar for RTX 3090 and RTX 4090?

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#683

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet it's also a laptop you can basically take anywhere unlike a giant video card with 1000 watt power supply requirements.

Nvidia and AMD both have their own unified memory laptop SOCs, now. Apple Silicon's GPU is relatively weak, it's one of the less-efficient ways to use 100w for compute. Even the fastest Apple Silicon chips like the M5 Max and the M3 Ultra still put up worse GPU compute performance than last-gen laptop RTX 4080 chips. And they don't scale, the largest M3 Ultra cluster you can configure is still ~2,000x smaller than a…

As I mentioned above you can't take the data center into the cafe somewhere. We're talking about running local models here.

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#684
post #682

If anyone else is running this on an RTX 5090, https://github.com/Neroued/ninfer as inference engine gets me ~138 tokens/second, roughly double what I get with a naive llama.cpp setup.

It there anything similar for RTX 3090 and RTX 4090?

I'm not sure about a 4090 but there is a fork for 3090s: https://github.com/Don-Chad/ninfer-3090

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#685
post #665

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AgentWorld is a pretty recent MoE release from the Qwen folks with quite a bit better performance than 3.6, released around the same time as 3.7 Plus/Max, I guess. Not sure why it didn't get more attention, as it is definitely better than 3.6 35B A3B on all dimensions, but especially for agentic use. Still nowhere near the dense models (even 3.6 27B), but clearly an upgrade in the small Qwen MoE line. https://hugging…

HUH? AgentWorld is a simulation of the world (e.g. tools and programs) for use by an agent!

And, yet it outperforms Qwen 3.6 35B A3B on Terminal Bench and SWE, etc. I dunno.

Edit: I guess you're right; apparently it's for simulation. I didn't look into it beyond the benchmarks. But, it does work in an agentic context, regardless. It'll write code, and drive an agent.

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#686
post #663

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You just can't compress the entire human knowledge into a 30GB file Fortunately, that isn’t necessary! What LLMs need is a level of fluency with key concepts so that they can (1) make effective use of retrieval tools and (2) understand the material in the context window. 30GB-sized models can absolutely store enough knowledge to do this. Here is an example from the field of law. Most lawyers who have litigated cont…

> (1) make effective use of retrieval tools and ( A downside is that you can't just download a lot of that knowledge, vs with the weights the copyright infringement has been outsourced to the lab. Nor can you just search for the info because the internet as a whole is increasingly aggressive at blocking anything that looks like an AI agent. I'd love to see more retrieval powered local AI-- I think it's an area that o…

I wonder how much more effective LLMs would be at general knowledge if you just download wikipedia and set up an MCP for it.

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#687

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Asking it factual information[1]. You just can't compress the entire human knowledge into a 30GB file. [1] Without searching the internet. And even if you allow it, you'll get much worse results because search means browsing and parsing the top results, and search results are horrible, whereas internal knowledge from training encompasses the entire internet plus all books including very niche stuff.

> You just can't compress the entire human knowledge into a 30GB file. ...I'm just asking questions here... how sure are we of this? If you'd asked me six years ago whether we could compress all of human knowledge into a 1 TB file, I would have said no, and yet here we are. If you can do 1 TB, why not 30 GB? It's, like, within one order of magnitude.

English Wikipedia is around 25GB compressed

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#689
post #657

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Qwen 3.8 27B is only the second local model after Gemma 4 that managed to correctly reason through one of my private benchmarks. I don't expect you to blab publicly about your private benchmark, but what sorts of reasoning does it require?

Well, I will say: #1: it does not require deep world knowledge, because that's not what local models are for. #2: it directly attacks drive-by understanding, overly linear processing training, poor attention mechanisms, poor reasoning patterns or lazy assumptions that ignore very easy low hanging fruit. #3: it requires solid instruction following in the face of errors. a lot of models will run into errors and then fa…

I especially like #8. If you have some free time (don't we all have so much of that?) it would be really interesting to run a binary search on each model you have, to see at what size/complexity level it manages to solve the problem, say, 50% of the time.

Re: Qwen 3.8 27B

#690
post #518

Credit where it's due. Qwen 3.8 27B is only the second local model after Gemma 4 that managed to correctly reason through one of my private benchmarks. It took 5x as many tokens to do it and 12m30s with MTP enabled, but it did do it. Gemma 4 reasoned through it more implicitly, while Qwen 3.8 reasoned more explicitly. Laguna and Muse Glimmer failed hard on it, though they're useful for other tasks. The VRAM usage see…

Have you tried Muse 30B yet? I have been impressed with it. I have Qwen 3.8 27B hammering away right now against Muse. And Muse is doing a little bit better.

Vibes
Post reply on HN