Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
31–40 of 134 posts
Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#32[flagged]
Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#33Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#34They're still up $25B for the year, so it's hard to feel bad for them :-) On a more serious note, Jane Street has hired some very impressive technical talent. I'd work for them, myself, if I didn't have to relocate to Chicago.
[flagged]
Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#35They're still up $25B for the year, so it's hard to feel bad for them :-) On a more serious note, Jane Street has hired some very impressive technical talent. I'd work for them, myself, if I didn't have to relocate to Chicago.
Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#36Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#37[flagged]
Personally I have mixed feelings about what they do. The engineer in me used to root for them. The way they operate as a pure tech shop was very refreshing in the hedge fund/traditional finance world (crypto world is the opposite). But the trader in me now abhors how they make their money, that is arguably at the expense of retail traders.
Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#38If SA's losses were around $30B does that mean Jane Street owned half?
Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#39Re: Jane Street suffers $15B hit after meltdown at Situational Awareness
#40They're still up $25B for the year, so it's hard to feel bad for them :-) On a more serious note, Jane Street has hired some very impressive technical talent. I'd work for them, myself, if I didn't have to relocate to Chicago.