Earlier quoted context omitted.
To stream dns changes from site owners to dns servers. If you want to change a record, you post the change on atproto. DNS servers everywhere just subscribe to the jetstream. That way anyone can run a fast, local dns server which is kept up to date automatically.
How fast can I change my DNS records?
Bluesky Protocol Services
81–87 of 87 posts
Re: Bluesky Protocol Services
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
[Bluesky proves that for social media, no matter what your technology stack, capabilities, or mission, if your community is awful, growth will never follow.]( https://blueskyfeeds.com/bluesky-user-growth?t=3m )
Twitter seemed to have no issue growing so that doesn't seem right.
Re: Bluesky Protocol Services
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
We’d need a registry of some sort. And a name space. Register a name, associated to a Bluesky account. Then use that Bluesky account to update dns records.
I think it would be a bad idea to have domain name ownership tied to one specific social media account. What if someone doesn't have Bluesky or doesn't want to have the two connected?
Re: Bluesky Protocol Services
#84Great. My map application* has a place review system that was built on Atproto, we don't hold user's reviews, they're public, reusable by others. In case of data loss, replaying the jetstream was not possible. This v2 with history is perfect. * https://cartes.app
Every move/zoom in the map causes it to pollute the browser history. You might want to fix that.
https://codeberg.org/cartes/web/issues/2661#issuecomment-210...
Re: Bluesky Protocol Services
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chrome Windows, zoomed in on paris, france. Click the restaurant filter for search. The tab froze, tried multiple times. :3
Thanks ! It's the densest place in the world for restaurants. We're working on a v2 of place search by category, soon to come. Google's task is much easier on this one : they only show those who've paid ads at high zoom (well at least, that's what we can guess). We're trying to be exaustive, but it's too much in this case.
Re: Bluesky Protocol Services
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd like to see DNS ownership combined with the time range and an owner-unique key so you can go to the website you intended to visit rather than whoever happens to own the domain at the moment.
Why would they still have the server but not the domain?