Live data from Hacker News

Every Fucking Website (2020)

lxe.github.io

141–150 of 529 posts

Re: Every Fucking Website (2020)

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve long believed that making companies liable for paying damages if PII is leaked in a data breach would be the best way to stop excessive tracking. If you force them to have to manage user data like they’re handling radioactive waste then the expense and overhead involved is a natural drag on the business logic that drives the bottomless appetite for data collection. They’ll collect it if they actually need it, an…

The most valuable data breach content isn’t your advertising tracking data, though. It would be your payment information, which is orthogonal to most of the tracking data. The black market demand for leaked advertising-related tracking data is basically nil, except maybe in cases where it’s related to something else exploitable or usable for blackmail like if someone frequents cryptocurrency exchanges or porn sites.…

[dead]

Re: Every Fucking Website (2020)

#144

The cookie thing, I assume it's EU-only, is an example of the EU policy making process being fundamentally broken in some way. If you create a flawed policy and don't fix it many years after it's very visibly obvious that it's a bad policy, something is really wrong.

It's not a cookies banner. It's a request to harvest your data and share it with third parties for purposes that are not required for the service you're offering.

No harvest data to 936 partners? No need for a banner!

Re: Every Fucking Website (2020)

#145
Needs a shopping cart that when you click submit, does nothing, requiring you to open web dev tools to discover the silent 503 error, with no way to report the error. Bonus points for a bank account, credit card or retirement fund

Re: Every Fucking Website (2020)

#148
post #18

The cookie thing, I assume it's EU-only, is an example of the EU policy making process being fundamentally broken in some way. If you create a flawed policy and don't fix it many years after it's very visibly obvious that it's a bad policy, something is really wrong.

it's an example of malicious compliance by some, and herd mentality by others. I had a discussion with my CFO about removing the cookie banner from our website (because we don't set any tracking cookies, and cookies for things like login are exempted) and he said "yeah, but it makes the site seem less legitimate.

> but it makes the site seem less legitimate

I have yet to head that cookie prompts are a sign of legitimacy. What business has customers that would think that way?

Re: Every Fucking Website (2020)

#149
post #95

Should load much slower. Also, where is the unrelated autoplaying video that will unmute if you actually click it, that follows your scrolling and only becomes smaller when you dismiss it? Plus, it should probably have text that cuts off letting you know you can have access for just $10/month. Plus, isn't this website undissmissably "better in the app" after a few minutes of attempting to use it on a phone? Where's t…

"We value your privacy! We and our 892 legitimate business partners use cookies to improve your experience."

Re: Every Fucking Website (2020)

#150
post #111
post #72

Yea but do you guys remember when we actually needed pop up blockers to avoid having a site spawn like 10 new windows behind the current one, and tabs didn’t really exist yet, and the popups had adult content and sometimes they autoplayed sound/video? Like, internet explorer 6 era? Sometimes I miss those days

You knew you done goofed when the adult site you opened on your family computer was opening new windows faster than you could close them...

Not a problem; you were on a 28.8k, so the adult banner images would take forever to load, so you could close the pop-ups before they got you in trouble
Post reply on HN