381–390 of 626 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let me ask it differently. You state the companies and their investors are colluding. Who are they colluding against ?
The public that buys the stock at ipo at this inflated valuation and unwittingly buys indexes which include it (as with spacex).
I bought $18 GLM official subscription yesterday (5.2, but new model version was already leaking on some docs), set it up with Claude Code harness... and I’ve bumped to $80 plan almost immediately. It’s the first model that agreed on a proper security research (red team scenario), executed it seamlessly, including 0-days in WP plugins, RCE, 6.8 kernel exploit adaptation, etc - while playing against another GLM agent…
Anthropic was stingy as hell with its Fable and cybersecurity nonsense, switched to OpenAI which is much better but still not enough. I'm tempted to switch again...
Apple will release M7 MacBook Pros / Mac Minis next year, and they will be able to run free LLMs locally at native speed. All software developer notebooks will be replaced to run local models, saving a lot by cancelling Claude Code subscriptions. Developers win. Apple stocks will be rocketing. Everything else will go down. You're welcome.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
ArtificialAnalysis puts out benchmarks for harnesses now as well, and OpenCode seems to be winning it. https://artificialanalysis.ai/agents/coding-agents#coding-ag... I only found this yesterday, and it inspired me to start testing out OpenCode.
Can OpenCode dispatch background subagents yet? I tried it a week ago and saw nothing. This is 99% of my workflow at this point.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
what is this comment based on ? vibes?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
I’m in the Claude code harness for everything boat too. What are the alternatives?
Anyways, please try mine!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
OpenAI and Anthropic are both seeking trillion IPOs, while Chinese labs are pumping out open-weight models that are free for US providers to host and monetize. These Chinese models cost less of US SOTA models to run, even if they are less capable. Providers can just run them, offer cheap tokens, and pocket the margin. I just don't see how you justify a trillion valuation for US AI labs when the underlying models are…
There could be soon AI safety regulations that will stop the US to host or use the Chinese models.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
I'm gonna shamelessly plug my own here :) https://dirge-code.github.io/
I think creating your own agent is the Hello World of agentic coding. Instead of Rust, I used D for mine.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a chance that the real reason why they want to ban Chinese models is that they are so good at fixing bugs and preventing exploits that intelligence agencies have been using for espionage and surveillance for a long time.
Do you actually believe this?
Why do you _not_ believe it's a possibility?
OpenAI and Anthropic need to just go ahead and give people access to the cyber models. Otherwise we have a world of attackers using open and closed source models against a much smaller group of maintainers that are likely heavily dependent on Anthropic and OpenAI and for whom it may not be a simple matter to just get approval to start using the open model flavor of the month.