371–380 of 626 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are selling it, not running it. It is just a dedicated computer system, which should be managed by its owner, like any other on-prem servers. I doubt that it has a good price/performance ratio, but it is a solution for those who feel that they do not want to search, buy, assemble, install and configure every HW/SW component.
I take it we saw different demos. I'm under no NDA, if you actually want to know what's up.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
what is this comment based on ? vibes?
Apple will release M7 MacBook Pros / Mac Minis next year, and they will be able to run free LLMs locally at native speed. All software developer notebooks will be replaced to run local models, saving a lot by cancelling Claude Code subscriptions. Developers win. Apple stocks will be rocketing. Everything else will go down. You're welcome.
The RAM shortage situation won’t be sorted out within the next year.
I bought $18 GLM official subscription yesterday (5.2, but new model version was already leaking on some docs), set it up with Claude Code harness... and I’ve bumped to $80 plan almost immediately. It’s the first model that agreed on a proper security research (red team scenario), executed it seamlessly, including 0-days in WP plugins, RCE, 6.8 kernel exploit adaptation, etc - while playing against another GLM agent…
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There should be some kind of moratorium on new accounts. HN's always had waves of newcomers, but their impact was always limited. The wave passes and people either get filtered out or adapt. That doesn't seem to be happening anymore, since bots can churn out endless gibberish. He did answer you though. Native is x10 the non-native speed. 50/50 that's not a bot; though it could be a meat-proxy
> There should be some kind of moratorium on new accounts. OC was registered in 2016 though? What do new accounts have to do with this?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I take it from [1] (transcript of recent DeepSeek CEO discussion with investors) that DeepSeek would disagree on the immediate catastrophic impact to the likes of OpenAI or Anthropic. The reason is even though technology parity mostly exists, only OpenAI, Anthropic et al have the inference capacity to gain market share and generate revenue. Chinese vendors don't have the chips needed to scale up inference and gain ma…
is that releveant if people can host their own models? that activity still undermines the valuation / diminishes the US companies 'moat' ?
IMHO, this has the impact of softening the impact of data centers sitting unused in the long term if they can still serve open weight models, even if Anthropic or OAI have to scale down their expansion rate to pay the bills.
Regardless, reality has to give at some point; these valuations don't make any sense. We've been valuing GenAI as disruptive work, when in reality they're much closer to cloud providers with a beefy, one-pony-trick R&D department.
This will be roughly on pair with Kimi K3, but using a third of its parameters. Just 4 weeks ago the "Kimi K3 moment" was seen as a threat to Closed AI and in less than a month Z.ai have cut the parameter/RAM barrier to a third. Congratulation to Z.ai and all the hard working Chinese researchers who are quitely boiling the frog.