351–360 of 626 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
I’m in the Claude code harness for everything boat too. What are the alternatives?
I'm not that up to date with the latest AI developments, but I noticed that this article seems to use "Cyber Capabilities" as a shorthand for the model's ability at cybersecurity tasks? Is that now an established expression, same as "crypto" now refers to cryptocurrencies rather that cryptography? Because "cybernetics" actually means something different (yeah, old man yelling at clouds, I know)...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are a over a dozen EU open-weight providers. I’m not sure if they are even charging that much of an extra. EU-based clients have little reason to use non-EU inference providers.
> EU-based clients have little reason to use non-EU inference providers. Which models are most popular in Europe?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
I’m in the Claude code harness for everything boat too. What are the alternatives?
i like to challenge my assumptions and try new tools
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anthropic needs to teach Opus how to speak English again, because Opus 5 seems to have forgotten. Utterly incoherent a lot of the time. They seem to be so busy scare-mongering and cooking up guardrails and watermarks that they haven't noticed that their models are getting weird.
Amen brother, at this point I just copy and paste Claude's (Opus 5, Opus 4.8 -- doesn't matter which) summaries over to the window Kimi is in and: this is from claude, turn it into English for me would you? """ [claude's tortuous prose] """ No amount of asking it to answer me in a straight-forward manner, to be succinct, to not use phrases like "honest caveat", "crux", "load-bearing", "blocker", etc ever sticks for m…
A lot of the total cost of AI is fixing its "truth shaped errors", particularly in the presence of models that are very "gaslighty" when corrected.
GLM-5.2 is really the only model I've spent much time using that I didn't fatigue from being regularly lied to by the model, but that might be partially luck.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m in the Claude code harness for everything boat too. What are the alternatives?
I’ve tried a bunch of them, and I seriously do not understand these recommendations. It was a rough road and a steep hill, but right now CC is absolutely the best harness on the market, as for me, whatever top tier model is under the hood (mostly, some of them, like DeepSeek, don’t fit CC at all).
CC works but for me it felt like increasingly they have zero incentive to make it a great experience. You hear folks like Boris talk about spinning up thousands of agents over night and agents chatting back and forth in GitHub issues and while I think it’s great from figuring out what the future looks like I don’t think it represents the reality of ROI today. So the folks building the tool are so disconnected I am simply not sure it’s a great experience anymore.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
what is this comment based on ? vibes?
What’s the counter argument? pi and ohmypi are pretty fantastic. Of course like all developer tools it depends how you do your work but I am not sure what you are trying to achieve in your comment.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
I’m in the Claude code harness for everything boat too. What are the alternatives?
It works nicely in the browsers on my tablet and phone, too.
On exe.dev you can ask it to customize itself, and it will automatically rebase your customizations when upgrading to a new release.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone who knows anything realises banning things is a) impossible and b) your enemies will use them anyway, you are just depriving your own side of the advantages.
> Anyone who knows anything realises banning things is a) impossible and Maybe "It's really hard" is more accurate? We (humanity) for most part basically agreed to ban the usage of various chemical weapons in wartime, which seems to have drastically reduced the usage of it, even though it's still used by shit actors today from time to time. But it's hard to deny that usage didn't decrease after banning it, which make…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should try a better harness. Try pi, or ohmypi if you want a good OOB experience
I’m in the Claude code harness for everything boat too. What are the alternatives?
And this is coming from someone that's not particularly a big fan of Theo. T3 Code should get more recognition; people aren't just aware of it yet.