Gemini 3.7 Flash
451–460 of 525 posts
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#452Earlier quoted context omitted.
If my net worth were that high? No. Folks need to remember that we're closer to being homeless than we are to being as rich as them. You don't need to defend billionaires.
Quantitatively, yes. Qualitatively, no.
We should stop calling it a wealth tax and start calling it an unearned power tax. That’s a far more apt term.
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#453Earlier quoted context omitted.
These look exactly like all of the low budget bodega signs near me. They also look like a bunch of cheap ads for parties that I keep seeing. The sameness of style is uncanny. (I don't have the Bodega signs, but I'm thinking of shit like this, from a quick google: https://linkstub.com/en/wet-wild-foam-party )
Sigh. You might be interested in this piece that came to mind from Doctorow: “Let me explain: on average, illustrators don't make any money. They are already one of the most immiserated, precarized groups of workers out there. They suffer from a pathology called "vocational awe." That's a term coined by the librarian Fobazi Ettarh, and it refers to workers who are vulnerable to workplace exploitation because they act…
I don't know how well this actually translates to AI, though. We all understand that AI art has a pretty low quality, but sometimes low quality is enough. If I want an image for my D&D character that only I and my DM will likely ever see, I am fine with a 7 cent AI-generated image, but I'm not willing to pay 150$ for an artist to do it - not that I don't value their time, I just don't value the image that much. Before AI this was the same, I'd just have used an image from Pinterest and thought "Well, this isn't exactly a good match, but I can't find anything better".
But I assume real illustrators do things like illustrations for children's books? I'd like to believe that those are still done by actual people, not AI.
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#454Earlier quoted context omitted.
On DeepSwe it's strictly beaten by Luna on max, cost and result. Damn, Luna on max is as good on DeepSWE as Kimi k3, I think I dismissed this model unjustly.
So in a way Luna is the new Gemini Flash? I've been out of the game for a while.
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#455I'm really curious about this: the foundational paper behind today's LLMs came from Google, and some of the world's best scientists were at Google. So why are they falling so far behind in the AI race?
Are they? They provide AI overview to majority of web searches, and that alone requires enormous resources. Anthropic, OpenAI and others only serves their AI customers. Regarding the power of their model, my own experiences are that it doesn't fall behind. I've done many successful projects already, including quite a big one in Pascal. So no, I don't feel any difference between Gemini and others. I think it's just a long lasting fashion to whine about Google and its services.
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#456Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sergey's out spending $100 million to lobby against the billionaire tax in California. Lest his net worth shrink from roughly $250 billion to $237 billion. Can't become a pleb now! [0] [0] https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/10/google-co-founder-sergey-b...
not that I'm intending to defend Sergey here but, if you could spend 0.04% of your net worth to protect 5% of your net worth (and probably all of your easy liquidity)... wouldn't you?
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#457Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes it is cheap, but per task DeepSeek v4 Flash is a bit more expensive and lands between Terra and Gemini 3.6 Flash in quality. Closer to Gemini than Terra...
Fable orchestrating DeepSeek v4 Flash to implement a plan is my new favorite thing. It's so freaking fast, but you gotta tell Fable to watch Deepseek like a hawk or it'll go off the rails.
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#458Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#459Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#460Earlier quoted context omitted.
What would a hedge fund want to do on this exactly? It’s too slow for hft and I’m not sure what they would be doing where ms matter but is not hft.
It's not like there are only two buckets: 1. HFT doing ass-simple arbitrage where only latency matters 2. More sophisticated slower trading taking in deeper signals Those are two points along a continuum. If you are reacting to an earnings announcement by having an LLM read the earnings release and listen to the call, getting the results a few seconds earlier lets you get your trade in a few seconds earlier. Just bec…