We are now considering dropping support for the model family all together. All of their models require significant scrubbing of errant thinking blocks, inner monologues, and it's consuming more engineering resources than it's worth.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
351–360 of 525 posts
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#352The Gemini Flash models makes perfect sense to me coming from a company like Google. Google AI Mode for search is a product I really find useful. It makes sense that Google focused on smaller, faster yet smart enough models that wouldn't break your bank on inference. It plays well into their product ecosystem. Google AI Mode consistently gets me consistently good results and good speeds. It really changes what "googl…
I similarly have a weird affinity for Gemini that I can't really articulate. I used Gemini's free chat and found it great for exploring technical topics (and random one-off general walking-around-questions) and appreciated its speed, tone and accuracy. I spent a month playing with Gemini CLI / Antigravity and found it also an effective coding agent, at least for my workflow (entirely in the loop development and revie…
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#353Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#354Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#355The "introductory pricing" for this 3.7 Flash model is really weird. It's scheduled to double in price on December 31, 2026, but who would anticipate still using this model five months from now? Especially since 3.6 Flash came out just three weeks ago! My first effort with default thinking level produced an ambitious pelican, let down by a flawed bicycle: https://tools.simonwillison.net/markdown-svg-renderer#url=ht..…
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
FWIW I definitely did not not need to do anything like that to generate a key via AI Studio. It was like three clicks to get the free tier key, later on enabling billing was a few more plus typing in credit card info.
yeah, "enabling billing" is a whole other ordeal. Like it all makes sense, it's not that hard, it's just a lot of extra clicks where the competition doesn't require that. You can blow off this feedback as the user whining, but it's real friction and the competition doesn't have that, so users are going to go elsewhere if they can.
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you help me understand how it is hard to get an API key from Google? You just head on over to http://aistudio.google.com/api-keys and create a key... not any different from platform.openai.com? Disclaimer: I work in Google so it might be that this link is not publicly well known
Disclaimer that I haven't tried this since January, so things may have changed in the last 7mo, but this was my experience at that time: https://x.com/pwnies/status/2010523020629274723 At a high level though, as a rule of thumb Google assumes that they're serving companies at Google scale first, and at a human scale second. For other companies it's the opposite. Generally what that means is the first experience you g…
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
Other thoughts: I really think Google has fallen behind here. Even as a high speed offering (this build took ~7min, which is pretty good!), it wont be able to claim dominance for long with cerebras announcing the Sol preview today: https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/accelerating-gpt-5-6-sol-ultraf... . It's not a bad model by any means, but I just don't know what situation I'd reach for 3.7 Flash first for. Google really n…
Can you help me understand how it is hard to get an API key from Google? You just head on over to http://aistudio.google.com/api-keys and create a key... not any different from platform.openai.com? Disclaimer: I work in Google so it might be that this link is not publicly well known
I do pay for OpenAI, Anthropic, and ElevenLabs keys.
Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#359Re: Gemini 3.7 Flash
#360Earlier quoted context omitted.
gemini flash is probably the best model for visual tasks right now. they also make it really easy to ingest videos
Also best at OpenSCAD, seemingly for the same reason, at least in terms of "iterate on a design, comparing visual output to target".
But I don't do "compare visual output to target" as much as 3D reasoning type tasks (eg: "Build a G1 curve where the -X face meets the +Z face" etc)