Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
11–20 of 231 posts
Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#12Am I getting old? 09-14 is not even close to the old web for me. The old web, to me, was back when people still published physical 'phone' books for websites.
Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#13Webpages dying is probably one of the biggest design flaws of the original web. I am not saying old content needs to be preserved forever, but so much content has factually been lost over time. Old logs from text-based MUDs for instance, even for MUDs that still exist today.
It's the great irony of digital media. Copying data is accurate to the bit and is preserved "as-is", but in practice, it requires someone to maintain servers, to care about it. To separate out what is worth preserving. We hot-linked to all those image hosts because we couldn't imagine them disappearing. Archive.org had incredible foresight and if it didn't already exist, I'd call such a project a pipe dream.
No, we hot-linked all those image hosts because we didn't want to pay to host it ourselves.
Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#14Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#15Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the great irony of digital media. Copying data is accurate to the bit and is preserved "as-is", but in practice, it requires someone to maintain servers, to care about it. To separate out what is worth preserving. We hot-linked to all those image hosts because we couldn't imagine them disappearing. Archive.org had incredible foresight and if it didn't already exist, I'd call such a project a pipe dream.
> We hot-linked to all those image hosts because we couldn't imagine them disappearing. No, we hot-linked all those image hosts because we didn't want to pay to host it ourselves.
I enjoyed the emails I got from a couple people who were adamant I "hacked" their site because their "web developer" linked to images on my server... images that now said stuff like "I'm a loser bandwidth thief!", etc. (I never did use really nasty "shock" images-- just taunting stuff.)
Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#17Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#18I found an old database backup of 0.mk on a disk I had kept. 0.mk started in 2009 as a passion project built by three of us. We worked on it for a few hours each week around our regular jobs. We eventually closed it in 2014 because the revenue (hint: no revenue) could not cover hosting, development, and the constant work of fighting spam and reviewing abuse. The recovered historical corpus contains 657,607 links. For…
How did you managed to obtain that domain? Usually single digit or letter domains are “reserved”.
Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#19Am I getting old? 09-14 is not even close to the old web for me. The old web, to me, was back when people still published physical 'phone' books for websites.
Re: Where did the old web go? We followed 657,607 links to find out
#20Webpages dying is probably one of the biggest design flaws of the original web. I am not saying old content needs to be preserved forever, but so much content has factually been lost over time. Old logs from text-based MUDs for instance, even for MUDs that still exist today.
It's the great irony of digital media. Copying data is accurate to the bit and is preserved "as-is", but in practice, it requires someone to maintain servers, to care about it. To separate out what is worth preserving. We hot-linked to all those image hosts because we couldn't imagine them disappearing. Archive.org had incredible foresight and if it didn't already exist, I'd call such a project a pipe dream.