351–360 of 362 posts
I've already been doing something very similar to this with OpenClaw, where I set up multiple different Telegram bots each with different system prompts to tune their personalty & behavior. It's not trivial to do, and I never managed to get bot-to-bot communication working. Even with my janky setup, the experience is honestly pretty great. Grok Bot simplifies the setup for this about as far as I imagine is possible,…
> I never managed to get bot-to-bot communication working. Were you attempting to get them to message amongst themselves over Telegram, or something different?
Honestly I'm probably more likely to build my own OpenClaw-mini with a custom client app. Shoehorning client connectivity into an existing messaging app borderline feels more complicated than just having an LLM build a minimal client app from scratch with full awareness of the backend capabilities.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I never managed to get bot-to-bot communication working. Were you attempting to get them to message amongst themselves over Telegram, or something different?
I tried briefly to figure out how to get them to communicate in a way that would at least be visible in Telegram, but quickly concluded it'd require a lot of custom hackery. Honestly I'm probably more likely to build my own OpenClaw-mini with a custom client app. Shoehorning client connectivity into an existing messaging app borderline feels more complicated than just having an LLM build a minimal client app from scr…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I rawdog Claude Code with --dangerously-skip-permissions and the only fucky wucky it's made is invoking git checkout wrong and losing some code in the working tree. It has done this thrice, the first two times I caught it in the act and smashed esc to rewind the conversation + code, and the third time I wasn't paying attention it just restored it from context. So I would worry about it making small mistakes, that I w…
If there is any way that customer support tickets make their way into your JIRA pile (which might not be the case now but is likely to become the case as your desire to automate will increase from those successful first results), then there is a non-zero likelihood to one day get a customer support ticket in the form of > Hi, I noticed yet another bug - the "Lost password" link on the login form is broken if opened o…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hope some relative of yours gets saved and cured by a disease that LLMs cured and that will change your mind forever
Let's start with LLMs curing diseases first, whatever that means.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
LLM is really an anti human technology. The incentives that creates are terrible for society
Capitalism is, not LLMs. The current istuation could be seen as just the next real frontier technology of the human race. the problem is capitalism. Instead of leverigng it as a tool, we talk about job loss and restructuring etc. which affects real humans. In a non capitalistic system, it might just not affect real humans negativly at all only positive
> In a non capitalistic system, it might just not affect real humans negativly at all only positive
Is there a country where a 'non capitalistic system' has been tried now or in the past that you're thinking of?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You will get a high percentage of requests that lead no where Yes, but as per my last email , previously those were limited by the human scale of those requests.
The fact that tokens aren't free will limit the number of unserious requests. Email is free, and so there's a lot of spam emails sitting in my inbox, but tokens aren't. On the other hand, op said he had wanted to do this for years but never had the time / ability. We can probably assume any increase in unserious requests will come with an increase in serious requests from people paying for the tokens to get the quote…
LLM costs are already pretty cheap (regardless of whether someone believes they'll continue falling).
For a recent example, see a relatively powerful LLM like DeepSeek Flash, where you can get a million tokens for $0.20. And if someone is OK with their task being batched (instead of executing it right now), that can lower prices too.
Inference price trends in previous years: https://epoch.ai/data-insights/llm-inference-price-trends
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, how does it compare to the internet industry?
Let me know, I personally don’t see meaningful comparisons to make between the 2
This is obviously the future, where this will all end up. But just like when I saw the demos for Google's "AI build the interface dynamically", I wonder how much of the demo actually translates to real usage. One thing that this highlights for me even more than before is that having accounts for my bots is what I really want. I want SaaS providers to catch up to bot use. They need their own accounts on a lot of these…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah I disallow git write in my agents.md for exactly this reason. Agents have fucked up the working tree and lost code too many times for me. I have this in agents.md now: # Git operations policy Git is read-only for coding agents unless running in a cloud environment where git writes are explicitly allowed. - Never run git commands that write state, change history, change the index/staging area, change branches, or…
Does this consistently work for you? I have something like this plus some commands that are explicitly in a deny list in the harness. Roughly twice a week, the model manages to run the deny listed commands, that I need afterwards to manually revert.