I had high expectations for V4 Pro, especially since DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 performed so well compared with other Flash models. What a letdown.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
441–450 of 493 posts
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#442Deepseek V4 Pro 0813 is the most unreliable model I have tried, it works on pass@3 shockingly well you can get it to match Sol or Fable perhaps in task done, but it's horrendous at pass@1 very prone to going wrong and doing horribly at most benches. I am not sure what it is buy I suspect it might be GRPO.
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#443Before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813's price goes up, I expect a surge of frantic traffic — hope the servers can hold up.
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#444Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#445Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is a pain from openRouter if you don't define your providers correctly, but for DeepSeek, surely not- the weights aren't released yet and there's only one provider, DeepSeek.
With Deepseek as the provider, there's no issue of course, but that means you don't filter providers for data retention, and you could also choose direct API use with them at that point.
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#446I keep my agents on tight leashes, using them very interactively for bouncing off ideas, architecture, and then writing code (especially prototyping) and Flash has been crushing everything I ever needed it to do.
Maybe my ambitions are too tame compared to people needing Fable / Sol grade models, but I'm probably staying on Flash and not moving on to Pro for the foreseeable future.
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right now, sol-xhigh is my favorite model. I feel that Opus 5 is dumber than 4.8. Fable is too expensive to do anything (limit of $50, started a prompt at $25, ended up at $75, is bullshit, but at least it's "free credits"). DeepSeek is okay for random API-based stuff, as it's cheap. Local open models running on a 5090 are hit or miss. I feel that most GGUFs/quants are awful...
Opus 5 degrades to word salad. I wonder if it is because of watermarking.
I think it could be the watermarking, but at this point they might be deliberately complicating the prose so that we ask clarifying questions and that leads to more token spend.
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#448I've been using the last Deepseek Flash update for a week and I'm amazed. It was a capable model for easy tasks but now it looks like it can do some heavy development for peanuts. I can't wait to try this new one.
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#449Suddenly get a big debt on your account with nobody to respond.
As an early adopter of OpenRouter, I'm afraid they are in shambles.
Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
#450Been testing this on hobby project https://github.com/arj03/seedkernel/ . Latest flash was a big step up. Pro feels really slow compared. Claude opus is still better day this level.