Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

401–410 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#401

Post by Paradigma11 »

soVeryTired wrote: post #310
mpalczewski wrote: post #261

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

Absolutely, if there is any somewhat reasonable alternative, I will always use a non Musk product. Its less about morals but more about self interest. I am from Europe and Musk supports far right extremists and a breakup of the EU. I will not support and enable someone who intends to do me harm.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#402

Post by [deleted] »

notourproblem wrote: post #400
darkoob12 wrote: post #388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does. I believe he is one of the worst people and contributed to misery of humanity. I had nothing against him until he dismantled USAID. The richest man in the world did not go to a party on weekend to make sure that poorest men on the world have less help. He was basically on the side of HIV. So i never use his products. Beside don't read too much in to benchmarks. They are alrrady ruined by Goldhart principle.…

[flagged]

[deleted]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#403

Post by Pearse »

notourproblem wrote: post #400
darkoob12 wrote: post #388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does. I believe he is one of the worst people and contributed to misery of humanity. I had nothing against him until he dismantled USAID. The richest man in the world did not go to a party on weekend to make sure that poorest men on the world have less help. He was basically on the side of HIV. So i never use his products. Beside don't read too much in to benchmarks. They are alrrady ruined by Goldhart principle.…

[flagged]

Did you make an account just to make this comment?

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#404

Post by [deleted] »

dongttebayo wrote: post #307
davidguetta wrote: post #214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"everythin you don't like" is not a scientific argument, neither is the illegality of data centers on AI quality

So you’re asserting that the ends justify the means or? I’m confused by how your reply makes sense in the context of the parent comment. They weren’t stating a preference, they were linking to simple facts. Please do better.

[deleted]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#405

Post by fuglede_ »

pkaye wrote: post #44
hmokiguess wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe they are the only western provider that has Kimi K3 on a subscription plan today as well. I would love to ditch Anthropic and be on Kimi if there were a subsidized plan like that with ZDR

GitHub Copilot does have Kimi K3.

There seems to be something strange going on with how it plays with the GHCP harness: I've experimented on a variety of inputs (code, plain text, literature search), and more than half the time it falls into an infinite text/tool call loop a la GPT-2. Which is a bit spooky as you're still being billed for those infinite loops! But when it works it works, and responses do seem a good deal cheaper than OAI/Anthropic equivalents, so hopefully they'll get it ironed out.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#406

Post by mpawelski »

Rover222 wrote: post #370
theyliesoeasily wrote: post #315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? The timing was precise, the motion was precise, his facial features were grimaced with intense determination. I cannot fathom calling it anything else, and I see denying it as a kind of shibboleth for "we know but we are pretending it wasn't, wink wink nudge nudge". Either it was deliberate, or the richest man on earth is so incompetent that he accidentally made a motion exactly mimicking a seig heil while welco…

You can find pictures of AOC and Mamdani doing the exact same gesture. It’s obviously a common gesture when emoting to crowds. But you just want to believe the narrative. If you’re worried about Nazis, take a look at all the pro-Hamas people.

It never cease to amaze me that the usual response (and Musk's defense itself) is that you can find a picture with some other figure with the same gesture.

Who cares about the pictures? There is a whole video where you can see that he does historically accurate nazi salute then turn back and do it again. Stop talking about pictures, always show video of what happened.

Find me a video of someone else doing the same and tell me it's the same. You won't, because what you see in video is much more obvious that what you see on pictures.

People are dump to only show still photo of Musk with this salute. Everyone know you can take picture out of context, when you watch full video it's much harder to do so.

Must was clearly showing it intentionally. Maybe because he's a troll (I wouldn't be surprised), maybe because of other reasons (I hope not...).

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#407

Post by mpawelski »

Rover222 wrote: post #387
theyliesoeasily wrote: post #376

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've seen the claimed pictures in context with their videos, they are distinctly different gestures in timing and emphasis - normal waves, without the sharp hand to chest -> locked elbow with hand outstretched motion. Again, the seig heil is a particular gesture with a particular emphasis and timing which Musk imitated precisely, twice in quick succession. Those other photos are decontextualized from gestures which w…

It is seriously absurd to believe he did it as a Nazi salute. But you just want to believe it.

Facts don't care about feelings.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#408

Post by embedding-shape »

ModernMech wrote: post #362
throwaway314155 wrote: post #360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't this a _good_ thing??

Yeah, but it also makes budgeting hard. Normally you'd want to budget about 20% per day to use your whole week up in time. But since they reset usage sporadically, it becomes optimal to burn tokens as fast as possible to be as low as possible when they reset. But since you don't know when resets are coming, it becomes kind of frustrating trying to game it out. One week they're resetting like crazy so you're trying to…

> use your whole week up in time [...] optimal to burn [...] trying to game it out [...] you're trying to burn tokens as fast

This whole thing sounds crazy to me, why are you so focused on making sure you hit 0% usage left when it's supposed to reset? Why can't you just use what you have and if it resets, it resets, and if it doesn't, it doesn't?

I've calculated I can spend about ~12% of usage every day, more or less, this is my "budget". If it resets, then the "12% per day" gets reset for that day, but that's it. Sounds crazy to me that I'd "invent work out of nowhere" just to spend more usage, why on earth would I adopt such a workflow? Sounds like you're burning tokens just to burn tokens???

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#409

Post by darkoob12 »

notourproblem wrote: post #400
darkoob12 wrote: post #388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does. I believe he is one of the worst people and contributed to misery of humanity. I had nothing against him until he dismantled USAID. The richest man in the world did not go to a party on weekend to make sure that poorest men on the world have less help. He was basically on the side of HIV. So i never use his products. Beside don't read too much in to benchmarks. They are alrrady ruined by Goldhart principle.…

[flagged]

then why did you spent 30 billion on stupid Iran war?

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#410

Post by jamesrcole »

UltraSane wrote: post #394
jamesrcole wrote: post #386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see you didn’t pay attention to what I did and did not say in my original comment. I’ve read a biography of him and When The Heavens Went On Sale, which covers SpaceX [Edit: I'd remembered the book incorrectly. I have read that book, but it doesn't cover SpaceX. The books that I'd read that cover SpaceX are The Space Barons: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and The Quest To Colonize The Cosmos, by Christian Davenport, and Li…

Lets assume what you say is true about Musk THEN, it isn't true about current day Twitter addicted, drug addicted, brain damaged Musk at all. If he ever had any capability to execute and listen to advice the Cybertruck proves he doesn't anymore. Musk has learned how easy it is to fool people like you and is all in on it.

> Lets assume what you say is true about Musk

There's no need to assume. If you are actually educated on the subject, you know it is the case. You don't because you're ignorant about it. Which would be fine, if you weren't pontificating about things you know nothing anything about.

> current day Twitter addicted, drug addicted, brain damaged Musk

this is like conspiracy-theory level stuff.

Post reply on HN