Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

321–330 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#321

Post by sieabahlpark »

soVeryTired wrote: post #310
mpalczewski wrote: post #261

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

[dead]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#322

Post by forestrywat »

baal80spam wrote: post #51
forestrywat wrote: post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not virtue signaling. People are allowed to have morals. And they are allowed to act in ways that align with those moral beliefs. > do you use Apple equipment despite Apple’s use of Chinese slave labor? If someone said they didn't buy Apple because of this, I'd support them in that too. People. Are. Complicated. We're allowed to have beliefs, we're allowed to have beliefs that aren't internally consistent. You g…

> It's not virtue signaling. Oh but it is. Normal people don't go to McDonalds shouting: "I refuse to eat here because they kill cows!". They just... don't go there.

Your analogy is goofy. An analogy is like, "People don't go to other people's kitchens and discuss their thoughts on McDonalds". And yeah, they totally do.

The person isn't complaining about grok to grok, they aren't even complaining about grok on X.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#323

Post by jamesrcole »

UltraSane wrote: post #277
krakrum wrote: post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Light generation is the most complicated part and Elon plans on doing Free Electron Laser (FEL) which is not as complicated as self contained tin based solution that ASML uses now

Why do you give Elon any credibility? FEL is not proven at all and is much much riskier than using existing EUV machines. Plus if it breaks all your machines are down until you fix it.

[flagged]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#325

Post by michaelmrose »

tsegratis wrote: post #313
soVeryTired wrote: post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

i read an independent study that found other ai were all left of center (how ever one measures that, sentiment analysis normalized to a given population??). they said grok was evenly left/right split but what's to validate any given population as centrist anyway they suggested the ai opinion drift was caused by internet demographics not directly reflecting actual population i.e. California publishes more etc

[flagged]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#326

Post by UltraSane »

jamesrcole wrote: post #323
UltraSane wrote: post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you give Elon any credibility? FEL is not proven at all and is much much riskier than using existing EUV machines. Plus if it breaks all your machines are down until you fix it.

[flagged]

Musk has had very little to do with the actual Success of Tesla and SpaceX and a LOT to do with the recent failures of Tesla, with his constant lies about FSD and the epic failure of the Cybertruck. Tesla hasn't had a new CAR model since 2020! I'm so tired of people mindlessly assuming past "success" is a guarantee of future success in completely different industries and technology. This just proves how little they actually understand how anything works.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#327

Post by Computer0 »

soVeryTired wrote: post #310
mpalczewski wrote: post #261

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

I avoid Grok for meaningful token spend on purpose/boycotting. I do check in via openrouter occasionally to check it's chat performance which has seemed fine to me since 4. My total grok spend has been ~$2. I disagree with his politics to a huge degree.

My token spend at api rates is about $3000 usd a month recently.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#329

Post by popalchemist »

soVeryTired wrote: post #310
mpalczewski wrote: post #261

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

[flagged]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#330

Post by aaron695 »

soVeryTired wrote: post #310
mpalczewski wrote: post #261

I've been using grok 4.5 with grok build soon after it came out and dropped claude. primarily for personal code. It communicates better. While that might not sound like a big deal it is. It doesn't give me a wall of text, tells me what I need to know and I'll make the actual decisions. It is very quick as well which means the sessions are far more interactive, I'll be steering it more. I sometimes cross check with co…

Out of interest, do Musk's politics impact your decision on whether or not to use Grok? I'd be interested to know where folks lie on the (Agree / Disagree) and (Use / Don't use) axes.

[dead]
Post reply on HN