Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

191–200 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#191
post #49

I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding

once my codex/claude weekly limit was gone, i gave it a try. It was surprisingly good, not dumb in any way, and fast . I now require it as a part of 3-of-3 quorum with any codebase change.

> I now require it as a part of 3-of-3 quorum with any codebase change

Say more about this.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#192

I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding

I use Grok 4.5 High Fast in Cursor (Agentic window), and it's a genuinely great model.

I don't give a shit about Elon's politics in the same way I don't give a shit about Dario or Altman's politics.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#194
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they didn’t constantly reset, they’d be about the same as Anthropic. Right now, I find that Grok offers better value, uses fewer tokens per turn, and makes better code. I haven’t tried Cursor because I don’t want to change editors again, but maybe I should try it…

Are there any projects that track how much usage of each model translates to how much percentage drop in weekly/5hr windows?

Usage? Not exactly. But I tried to make something that can estimate dollars per tokens in actual usage while taking into account multiple factors.

https://harness.eveid.com/lazy-harness-cost-simulation

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#195
post #126
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But can you trust any number or metric coming out of SpaceX given everything? Also you mean their own compute like the illegal data centre turbines ? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/15/elon-musk...

being a public company forces a lot of trust and transparency bc otherwise shareholders will sue you into oblivion

SpaceX is run by an absolute ghoul who managed to get away with securities fraud ("funding secured"), what makes you think there's any accountability left in public markets?

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#196
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This statement doesn't go far enough given Elon's direct and hands-on involvement with DOGE and the 2024 elections. Very few of the richest people of the world are personally entangled in meddling with government agencies directly, for example.

I think it would be extremely naive to believe that the rich weren't literally writing the laws. They're just usually more quiet about it.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#197
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe they are the only western provider that has Kimi K3 on a subscription plan today as well. I would love to ditch Anthropic and be on Kimi if there were a subsidized plan like that with ZDR

Opencode have it in their subscription

I believe it's one of the models you have to go in to your settings on and enable Chinese providers for to use. Could be mistaken. I wish there was a clear list on this.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#198
post #126
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But can you trust any number or metric coming out of SpaceX given everything? Also you mean their own compute like the illegal data centre turbines ? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/15/elon-musk...

being a public company forces a lot of trust and transparency bc otherwise shareholders will sue you into oblivion

From Matt Levine's description, SpaceX has a governance model that explicitly makes it resistant to shareholder lawsuits. It's not a Delaware corporation.

It might or might not work long-term, but I wouldn't count on courts to help.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#199
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Competition keeps service quality high and pricing low - even if you aren't using Grok, the mere existence of Grok keeps pricing for whatever provider you use lower and service faster and more reliable.

That's fair. But my point is from a business POV, why would SpaceX want to invests hundreds of billions of CapEx on a third or fourth frontier model, which cannot compete with chatGPT and claude on the high end, and getting squeezed by open weight models on the low end

That is more FOMO and maybe some end-game where SpaceX essentially owns a vertical slice of ISP+Datacenter+AI+application stack.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#200
post #106

SpaceXAI is the only frontier model company that had its own compute/date centres and soon chip making factory, I think they will pull ahead with cheaper tokens similar intelligence and better harness/tools. Grok build is 2-5x faster than Claude Code in my opinion.

But can you trust any number or metric coming out of SpaceX given everything? Also you mean their own compute like the illegal data centre turbines ? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/15/elon-musk...

Now do Anthropic's copyright fines.
Post reply on HN