Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

171–180 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#171

Post by iAMkenough »

christkv wrote: post #83
jm4 wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have. He was using it due to philosophical reasons the same way many people have philosophical reasons for avoiding it. I don't know how many people are like that, but it's not exactly where you want to position your product if you're a business. Personally - and I know I'm not alone with this sentiment based on comments I see on this site - I wouldn't touch Grok no matter how good or cheap it is. I don't trust Elo…

Versus Sam,Dario or the CCP? Im all for running local models but im sor far from being able to pay for a large model hardware setup. My strix halo box is like driving a beaten up vespa when the frontier models are Ferraris.

Yes, ethically Elon ranks lowest based on the past 5 years of questionable decisions, like uploading your entire codebase to their server without consent.

Elon is directly responsible for Grok becoming self-titled “MechaHitler” which the other three haven’t come close to matching yet.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#172

Post by post-it »

BurningFrog wrote: post #168
jm4 wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have. He was using it due to philosophical reasons the same way many people have philosophical reasons for avoiding it. I don't know how many people are like that, but it's not exactly where you want to position your product if you're a business. Personally - and I know I'm not alone with this sentiment based on comments I see on this site - I wouldn't touch Grok no matter how good or cheap it is. I don't trust Elo…

Supporting parties or candidates you want to win elections is a core part of democracy. Calling it "interfering with elections" is utterly bizarre to me.

Remember when he got hired by the federal government and walked away with a ton of private data?

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#174

Post by ukuina »

bilsbie wrote: post #164
dmode wrote: post #141

Can someone explain to me what's the point of Grok anymore? I don't understand why we need a third or fourth closed frontier model. It is clear that chatGPT has locked down the consumer play, and may be Gemini is there. Claude has enterprise locked up, followed by chatGPT and Gemini. Enterprise switching costs are notoriously high, and even if they switch, they have chatGPT or Gemini to choose from. Beyond that, you…

Why do we need Nissan? Three car companies are plenty.

Nissan would agree!

https://www.autoblog.com/news/nissan-reports-fifth-straight-...

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#175

Post by bix6 »

BurningFrog wrote: post #168
jm4 wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have. He was using it due to philosophical reasons the same way many people have philosophical reasons for avoiding it. I don't know how many people are like that, but it's not exactly where you want to position your product if you're a business. Personally - and I know I'm not alone with this sentiment based on comments I see on this site - I wouldn't touch Grok no matter how good or cheap it is. I don't trust Elo…

Supporting parties or candidates you want to win elections is a core part of democracy. Calling it "interfering with elections" is utterly bizarre to me.

Paying people to vote is interfering amigo.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#176

Post by MrBuddyCasino »

sidcool wrote: post #26

Grok is not the best model around, but it's decent. It gets the basic job done at a low price. I don't think it can advance frontier Math, yet.

It is also not annoying to use. It doesn’t overcomplicate things, and its quick. Much better than eg GLM 5.2.

Pretty good bang for the buck.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#177

Post by VariousPrograms »

bilsbie wrote: post #164
dmode wrote: post #141

Can someone explain to me what's the point of Grok anymore? I don't understand why we need a third or fourth closed frontier model. It is clear that chatGPT has locked down the consumer play, and may be Gemini is there. Claude has enterprise locked up, followed by chatGPT and Gemini. Enterprise switching costs are notoriously high, and even if they switch, they have chatGPT or Gemini to choose from. Beyond that, you…

Why do we need Nissan? Three car companies are plenty.

This might be the biggest Grok burn in the comments.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#178

Post by unselect5917 »

TSiege wrote: post #41

[flagged]

Interestingly, deleting this line "fixed" it:

>The response should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.

Interestingly, "politically incorrect" is a double negative that simplifies to "true".

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#180

Post by krakrum »

amarka wrote: post #136
feifan wrote: post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

being a public company forces a lot of trust and transparency bc otherwise shareholders will sue you into oblivion

True story, for example take Tesla's promise of self driving which was delivered back in 2015.

[flagged]
Post reply on HN