Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#51

Post by baal80spam »

forestrywat wrote: post #38
Recurecur wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

It's not virtue signaling. People are allowed to have morals. And they are allowed to act in ways that align with those moral beliefs. > do you use Apple equipment despite Apple’s use of Chinese slave labor? If someone said they didn't buy Apple because of this, I'd support them in that too. People. Are. Complicated. We're allowed to have beliefs, we're allowed to have beliefs that aren't internally consistent. You g…

> It's not virtue signaling.

Oh but it is. Normal people don't go to McDonalds shouting: "I refuse to eat here because they kill cows!". They just... don't go there.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#52

Post by [deleted] »

qwerpy wrote: post #46
Recurecur wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

When you make politics a big part of your identity, you can’t help but to inject it everywhere. It’s glaringly weird and annoying for those of us who are apathetic and just want to talk about tech, but that’s how it has been for a few years.

[deleted]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#53

Post by tekwarder »

hmokiguess wrote: post #29
satvikpendem wrote: post #2

Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.

I believe they are the only western provider that has Kimi K3 on a subscription plan today as well. I would love to ditch Anthropic and be on Kimi if there were a subsidized plan like that with ZDR

GabAI has KimiK3

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#54

Post by epolanski »

jryle70 wrote: post #39
LeBit wrote: post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I refuse to use that product because of the parent company.

I can respect if you say you hate their guts. Everyone has their worldview. But over moral or ethical stand? You don't have any if you're using Chinese models, or fly Middle East airlines, or countless of other products. Don't delude yourself.

Chinese models are open, Grok is not.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#55

Post by sumeno »

baal80spam wrote: post #51
forestrywat wrote: post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not virtue signaling. People are allowed to have morals. And they are allowed to act in ways that align with those moral beliefs. > do you use Apple equipment despite Apple’s use of Chinese slave labor? If someone said they didn't buy Apple because of this, I'd support them in that too. People. Are. Complicated. We're allowed to have beliefs, we're allowed to have beliefs that aren't internally consistent. You g…

> It's not virtue signaling. Oh but it is. Normal people don't go to McDonalds shouting: "I refuse to eat here because they kill cows!". They just... don't go there.

Didn’t realize we were posting on the xAI website. My mistake

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#56

Post by solid_fuel »

leerob wrote: post #31
sidcool wrote: post #26

Grok is not the best model around, but it's decent. It gets the basic job done at a low price. I don't think it can advance frontier Math, yet.

Probably can't advance frontier math yet, yeah. But please let us know other places you want to see Grok improve for future models!

[flagged]

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#58

Post by MisterKent »

inferniac wrote: post #45
jm4 wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have. He was using it due to philosophical reasons the same way many people have philosophical reasons for avoiding it. I don't know how many people are like that, but it's not exactly where you want to position your product if you're a business. Personally - and I know I'm not alone with this sentiment based on comments I see on this site - I wouldn't touch Grok no matter how good or cheap it is. I don't trust Elo…

>who turns around and uses the money to interfere with elections thats a very dumb reason considering all rich people do it, most are just not as open about it as Musk

"Everyone's doing it" presented with no evidence is just you trying to make yourself feel better for: - using from - driving a Tesla - voting for Trump

It's a really, really easy line to draw in the sand: don't support openly corrupt individuals.

It's absolutely true there's money in politics. To call all money in politics equally corrupt because Bernie got a dollar to have dinner with someone vs Elon effectively directly buying votes....

A complete lack of nuance here. And I wouldn't be surprised if corporations / super rich WANT you to think like that. The more defeatist the mentality becomes the more we just accept whatever they do next.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#60

Post by freejazz »

leerob wrote: post #31
sidcool wrote: post #26

Grok is not the best model around, but it's decent. It gets the basic job done at a low price. I don't think it can advance frontier Math, yet.

Probably can't advance frontier math yet, yeah. But please let us know other places you want to see Grok improve for future models!

[flagged]
Post reply on HN