Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 472 posts

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#31

Post by leerob »

sidcool wrote: post #26

Grok is not the best model around, but it's decent. It gets the basic job done at a low price. I don't think it can advance frontier Math, yet.

Probably can't advance frontier math yet, yeah. But please let us know other places you want to see Grok improve for future models!

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#34

Post by nomilk »

satvikpendem wrote: post #2

Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.

How does Grok 4.5 compare to Opus >= 4.8 though?

I'm willing to pay 2x for a 10% smarter model. Intelligence matters that much (because 10% smarter probably saves, on average, several hours of human time).

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#36

Post by CuriouslyC »

greenavocado wrote: post #24
jesse_dot_id wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Goes even further to exfiltrate your data, yeah.

That would be Muse Spark Contributor Tier. 12-21x price reduction at the expense of your digital existence.

I'd be the first model I'd reach for if I was providing a free service to AI gooners though. Serves them both right.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#37

Post by nomilk »

nylonstrung wrote: post #4

I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding

I had a security incident the other day and Grok was the only model that would help. Claude and GPT refused on ethical grounds and only gave general advice. In an emergency, I'd only trust Grok. However, that's the only time I used Grok for coding (since Opus 4.8 it would take a lot to get me to switch away from Anthropic)

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#38

Post by forestrywat »

Recurecur wrote: post #25
LeBit wrote: post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I refuse to use that product because of the parent company.

[flagged]

It's not virtue signaling. People are allowed to have morals. And they are allowed to act in ways that align with those moral beliefs.

> do you use Apple equipment despite Apple’s use of Chinese slave labor?

If someone said they didn't buy Apple because of this, I'd support them in that too.

People. Are. Complicated. We're allowed to have beliefs, we're allowed to have beliefs that aren't internally consistent. You gotta get over the idea that people aren't genuine believers in their beliefs.

Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

#39

Post by jryle70 »

LeBit wrote: post #18
nylonstrung wrote: post #4

I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding

I refuse to use that product because of the parent company.

I can respect if you say you hate their guts. Everyone has their worldview. But over moral or ethical stand? You don't have any if you're using Chinese models, or fly Middle East airlines, or countless of other products. Don't delude yourself.
Post reply on HN