I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding
Does it matter? Why turn it into a popularity contest?
Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
21–30 of 472 posts
Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
For $30/month, I'd expect it to have higher usage limits than Claude Code and Codex.
It really does. I felt like I could have spent $1000+ api token on claude for the amount of work on my $30 grok subscription.
An hour in, I've been running four terminals full bore on my $20/mo Grok sub and I'm at 9% for the week. Codex or Claude would easily have hit 5-hour or weekly limits.
Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#23I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding
[flagged]
Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#24Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.
Goes even further to exfiltrate your data, yeah.
That would be Muse Spark Contributor Tier. 12-21x price reduction at the expense of your digital existence.
Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#25Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#26Grok is not the best model around, but it's decent. It gets the basic job done at a low price. I don't think it can advance frontier Math, yet.
Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#27I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding
> I have never met a single human being who uses Grok for coding
Me too. The only people I ever saw using grok were using it by accident as they used copilot in auto mode and noticed some prompts were thrown it's way.
I saw far more people using Mistral than grok.
Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#28Interesting. Grok 4.5 is a capable model, although not quite at Fable/Sol levels. Will be interesting to see how this holds up. Musk appears to have made a savvy choice buying Cursor's data.
Re: Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
#29Cursor, since Grok 4.5, has had an incredible deal for frontier level models, their subscription now goes way further than OpenAI or Anthropic. Even on their lower tier plans you can use a lot tokens on their of their first party models (Grok and Composer) and not really run out comparatively. Combine them with an orchestrator and implementor type setup and it goes even further.
I believe they are the only western provider that has Kimi K3 on a subscription plan today as well. I would love to ditch Anthropic and be on Kimi if there were a subsidized plan like that with ZDR