DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

I find it interesting how much adoption seems to be influenced by momentum. Some of these Chinese models are surprisingly capable, but developers often default to the models that are already established as the “industry standard

Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

#7

Post by scrlk » Wed, Aug 12, 2026, 4:42 PM UTC

Benchmarks:

    | Benchmark                | DS-V4-Pro | DS-V4-Flash | DS-V4-Pro | DS-V4-Flash | GLM-5.2   | Kimi-K3   | Opus-4.8  | Fable 5       |
    |                          | 0813      | 0731        | Preview   | Preview     |           |           |           | (w/ fallback) |
    |--------------------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|---------------|
    | HLE (wo/w tools)         | 42.7/60.0 | 37.8/51.5   | 37.7/48.2 | 34.8/45.1   | 40.5/54.7 | 43.5/56.0 | 49.8/57.9 | 53.3/63.0     |
    | Terminal Bench 2.1       | 87.9      | 82.7        | 72.1      | 61.8        | 81.0      | 88.3      | 85.0      | 88.0          |
    | NL2Repo                  | 61.5      | 54.2        | 38.5      | 39.4        | 48.9      | -         | 69.7      | -             |
    | Cybergym                 | 83.3      | 76.7        | 52.7      | 38.7        | -         | 80.0      | 78.3      | 83.1          |
    | DeepSWE                  | 62.7      | 54.4        | 12.8      | 7.3         | 46.2      | 67.5      | 58.0      | 70.0          |
    | Toolathlon-Verified      | 74.1      | 70.3        | 55.9      | 49.7        | 59.9      | 76.5      | 76.2      | 77.9          |
    | Agents' Last Exam        | 25.7      | 25.2        | 16.5      | 15.8        | 23.8      | 27.6      | 25.7      | -             |
    | AutomationBench (Public) | 31.8      | 25.1        | 12.8      | 10.8        | 12.9      | 30.8      | 27.2      | 29.1          |
    | DSBench-FullStack        | 71.1      | 68.7        | 41.8      | 37.0        | 61.8      | 73.7      | 71.6      | 77.2          |
    | DSBench-Hard             | 67.2      | 59.6        | 31.1      | 25.8        | 54.5      | 63.0      | 71.7      | 68.3          |

Source: https://reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vmi0fg/deepseek_v4...

Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

#8

Post by k__ » Wed, Aug 12, 2026, 4:42 PM UTC

swiftcoder wrote: post #4

aabdi wrote: post #2

https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing/ Competitive with opus 4.8 but weaker than sol or fable. About 20x cheaper.

How does it stack against the updated Deepseek Flash version?

Around 5 percentage points better. (E.g., 87% instead of 82%)

Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

#9

Post by Gecko4072 » Wed, Aug 12, 2026, 4:46 PM UTC

k__ wrote: post #8

swiftcoder wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does it stack against the updated Deepseek Flash version?

Around 5 percentage points better. (E.g., 87% instead of 82%)

So not worth it over flash? Even at ~7x the size it isn't worth the price hike. Flash may be a monster of a model due to all the RL it received from free usage everywhere.

Re: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

#10

Post by Gecko4072 » Wed, Aug 12, 2026, 4:48 PM UTC

Currently burning money quickly on official deepseek api. They are also increasing pricing starting today. V4 Flash 0731 still feels like the most outstanding model of the past few months and probably to come.