Earlier quoted context omitted.
Counterpoint: you reinstall something later and all your setting and preferences are still there. It’s a classic cloud vs disk debate about where and who should persist and own the data. Lately I think it’s kinda refreshing that it’s entirely on your disk and up to you.
Maybe the correct UX could be to list the locations of settings data, their size and ask the user whether they want to leave them, put them aside in a dedicated folder ("the attic", "the basement" or whatever), or remove them
As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
41–50 of 158 posts
Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a user I don’t like installer packages as much because without special utilities, they’re opaque and it’s hard to tell what they’ll do. Of course copied binaries can cause plenty of trouble too, but I have much less of a reason to give an installed program admin privileges than I do an installer.
I really dislike PKGs and I have bought an app called Pacifist app to specifically know what they're doing.
I prefer this one: https://mothersruin.com/software/SuspiciousPackage/
But I’ve used both at different times with equally great results.
Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#43No one will ever convince me that the Mac approach for installing programs is intuitive or good UX. The whole argument of: "But if you think about it in ... way, it makes sense" is a terrible argument.
No one will ever convince me that literally anything about Windows isn't utterly insane.
Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#44Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#45I'm just glad I'm not the only one who says damage in their head for .dmg files
Since then I also read dmg as damage :)
Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#46Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#47Why not .pkg (next, next, installer)? For the past week, I've been tweaking my startup's CLI to install as a .pkg, satisfy Apple signing, and everything that goes along with that. I've often wondered why so many companies opt for the icon method.
Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#48They should offer a first-class way of "installing downloaded apps" and push developers to use it. I would say use an Installer package but I can't remember if there's issues with it not being a single file. So a zipped installer package. And then make that not have an unnecessary 12 step wizard.
Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#49Re: As a Windows user, it's a surreal way to install a program
#50You can drag the app to a different location. I have an entry level mini 8GB/255 GB SSD with 1TB external SSD. Everything goes on the external. There are only a handful of apps that insist on being installed in the system Application folder. Even had xCode running on the external.
Uninstalling is supposed to be as simple as moving the app to trash but often that leaves a load of stuff behind that no one tells you about.