Live data from Hacker News

USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

niemanlab.org

81–88 of 88 posts

Re: USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

#81
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes for big cities, but there are very very few independent local papers in less populated areas, for example: https://www.portlandmercury.com/news/with-a-new-media-conglo... Also the Oregonian (big Portland paper) and the Seattle Times (big Seattle paper) are not locally owned anymore.

The Seattle Times is still owned by the Blethen family (who have owned it since 1896).

Ah confused it with the Tacoma News Tribune

Re: USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

#83

Setting aside politics and personalities, are Palantir's products any good? At least on the surface, their products seem to have many competitors, so is the product quality actually driving their growth?

At least in the military aspect, I have heard nothing but great things about them from service member friends/family. I personally find the panic over Palantir, Data Centers, etc to be largely mass hysteria vs anything else. It has become an omni-cause like Israel (I mean part of the backlash against Palantir is that the CEO is Jewish, just read any internet comment thread on the topic.)

Another part is that Palantir is helping Ukraine defend against russia

Re: USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I decided to spot check a few, including places like Portland and Seattle, and it seems like private ownership by a family for the last century is pretty common. And isn't the main paper in Austin the Austin American-Statesman? That's the Hearst family. Though looking a little deeper, they were owned by Gannett until last year.

Yes for big cities, but there are very very few independent local papers in less populated areas, for example: https://www.portlandmercury.com/news/with-a-new-media-conglo... Also the Oregonian (big Portland paper) and the Seattle Times (big Seattle paper) are not locally owned anymore.

It’s interesting. Growing up, my small town of ~4000 had a local newspaper. It doesn’t exist anymore, as of 5-10 years ago. I think many less populated areas did have some independent journalism until very recently.

But at the same time there is also an online newsletter/blog/sort of newspaper that started maybe 15-20 years ago. It has maybe one or two employees but it’s mostly about high school sports and local events.

Re: USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

#85
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jokes aside, I do honestly wonder what they expect to learn from this kind of analysis.

For the newspaper: elderly people staying in 2 and 3 star hotels eating their free continental breakfast. For their website: slightly younger elderly people on their ipada eating breakfast at home. USA Today, feel free to contact me for payment details

Hey now, maybe they can finally figure out how many people get pissed off when they click on the left side of a page when they pull it up to get window focus to scroll and have the entire page navigate off back to the main USA Today homepage instead of whatever puff piece story they got linked to.

Re: USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not talking about illiteracy, ~50% of americans read at a 6th grade level or below... that's certainly enough to make an impact, the 2024 election was decided by ~250k votes across 3 states... Michigan specifically has a reading level below national average

And the percent of eligible citizens who vote is often not much more than 50% in presidential election years (higher recently but not for good reasons). It's even lower in mid-term years. If you're not an engaged, informed person and your worldview is based on USA Today headlines I'd rather you didn't vote.

well you can enjoy your imaginary world where you get to decide who votes and who doesn't, but I'd rather the people who do exist and vote in the real world read USA Today than nothing at all...

we're talking in the area of 100M+ people, remove accessible reading from them and you're left with what? cable news and tiktok?

Re: USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

#87
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When that single issue is a genocide, the calculus changes. Would you feel the same about a news source that argues the Hutus were acting in self defense?

I did not choose this world, it’s just the one I live in. If enough people believe something, it’s not really surprising to see it written, even if it is wrong. According to many comments I have read here and articles on even respectable American websites, I live in a communist shithole on the verge of collapse, we’re drowning in bureaucracy and we’re all just waiting for the good Americans to show us how everything…

You seem to be clueless about Israel’s war with Hezbollah in Lebanon (and probably about Gaza too).

Or you have redefined “genocide” to mean any war Israel is involved in.

Re: USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not talking about illiteracy, ~50% of americans read at a 6th grade level or below... that's certainly enough to make an impact, the 2024 election was decided by ~250k votes across 3 states... Michigan specifically has a reading level below national average

And the percent of eligible citizens who vote is often not much more than 50% in presidential election years (higher recently but not for good reasons). It's even lower in mid-term years. If you're not an engaged, informed person and your worldview is based on USA Today headlines I'd rather you didn't vote.

There's enough high quality video and audio news that it's fully possible to be an engaged and informed person even if you can't read for shit. Plus, text-to-speech is very good now. You can listen to written articles as well, even if you can't read them. You still need to evaluate sources and fact check, but that's a separate skill (albeit one most literate people also fail at).

I don't believe the literacy rate is a measure of intelligence, when the "three cueing" educational calamity is right there as an obvious explanation. That and Americans just being overworked and exhausted and sick all the time.

Post reply on HN