Live data from Hacker News

Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake

wsj.com

341–344 of 344 posts

Re: Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re right! And then they’re an inference provider too. All these come together with orbital data centers…

>All these come together with orbital data centers… Only if you remain wilfully ignorant of thermodynamics.

Go watch Scott Manley, the heat isn't the show stopper you think it is.

Re: Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake

#342
post #270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah yes, burn thousands of tonnes of methane (assuming Spacex) to launch a data centre satellite into an orbit, then burn thousands more to maintain it and update compute or burn the entire thing in the upper atmosphere, to avoid contributing to global warming by not burning all of that fuel and dry mass.

Both aluminum and iron atoms are heavy and thus make it into the ocean where they both increase the ocean's carbon sink capacity. https://phys.org/news/2021-05-aluminum-affect-climate-ocean-... From an energy POV, the chemical launch energy required for orbital insertion is 900GJ per satellite (when amortized) whereas the satellite produces 18,900GJ over its 5-yr lifetime, and far more if it lasts longer.

Then we should just outright seed the oceans, half assing it isn't going to do anything.

Re: Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake

#343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No they don't.

One share one vote. Dual-class structures allow insiders to treat public markets like an interest-free ATM without accepting the standard rules of accountability.

Look at the reason why Dual class stock is a thing. The Rich vs King conundrum.

Re: Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake

#344
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The iPod was a peripheral to use alongside your MacBook, it was meant to drive Apple computer sales initially and it's not like it was Apple's first attempt at a portable device (Newton). Nokia was building telecom equipment (stemming from their telephone cable experience, the insulation being a product of their original rubber business) and military equipment along with a bunch of other consumer electronics before t…

Spacex has no existing customer to satisfy their future launch ambitions with Starship, hence data centers in space, just like they did with starlink to provide the necessary demand for Falcon 9. The launch business is not profitable without a regular cadence, too many fixed costs - ground infrastructure and personnel. X can supply training data to to Xai and Grok is heavily integrated into X so there is some synergy…

Starlink would be a major customer. NASA is already eyeing Starship to get things to the moon. It's just such an enormous expense to develop that no one but SpaceX is willing to fund it directly.
Post reply on HN