Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

githubstatus.com

441–446 of 446 posts

Re: GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

#441

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They definitely managed to create a lot of reliable products. Windows NT was one of them. Up to Windows XP the products were pretty solid and each had visible improvement against the previous one. Their language products were/are still solid IMO. Maybe Visual Studio is sluggish, but we can still use an older version if we want. Plus they put a lot of effort optimizing VSCode, too. Even back in the MS-DOS/16-bit Windo…

reliable? Windows is the only operating system you have to constantly reinstall because it gets slower after a few months. To the point people think it's totally normal to do that!

At least they are reliable in/after the Windows 2000/XP/7 era? Even as I don't like Windows 10, I haven't reinstalled it for years.

Back then the other options for home computers are just too technical for normies. I tried to install Linux back in early 2000 and I couldn't even get through the install process. Skill issue for sure, but if I couldn't do it back then I'm sure none of my class mates could.

Re: GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

#442

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet they still have a completely separate IDP for employees https://github.okta.com .

most companies do. do you mean they’re not using AD only?

Most companies onboard and consolidate IDPs fairly quickly because it's quite easy to change the SSO configuration for services over just a few years.

My only guess is there's some circular dependency they want to avoid by keeping Okta.

Re: GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

#443

What is amazing is people do not switch away from GitHub. Maybe people are actually pretty tolerant of downtime if other things about the product or service are done right

The only thing that would make me switch is data loss.

Re: GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

#444

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The funny thing is that if companies wanted they could probably use AI to instead increase uptime. Keep existing QA teams (instead of replacing them) and then use AI for better and more timely monitoring (and messaging even) and as an additional Always-Testing™ layer of QA

"Just use AI" is definitely not the solve for the problems Github faces.

Shhh! Do you hear that? It's the collective scream of middle managers screaming in terror.

Jokes aside, yes, quite correct. Even frontier models like Fable have very obvious limits.

Re: GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

#445
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s no excuse. Particularly if it affects people self hosting their workers. These are folks that routinely make it a point to press on system design and scalability during interviews. Now they suddenly can’t scale or design systems but we should accept that?

Are you kidding? That's an insane amount of load increase to manage. "Scalability" isn't one thing, especially not at that level, so it's ridiculous to knock them for it. That amount of load ripples across your entire infrastructure.

Not hiring 20-25 year olds with social science Ph.D.-s would be a good start (don't remember where I saw that a while ago).

Next: proficient engineering managers, not just people who immediately bend a knee to the middle manager.

Oh wait, I went into sci-fi territory again. My bad.

Re: GitHub Actions and Pages are experiencing degraded availability

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GitHub Actions was always a mess. Because it is a Microsoft product. If you want to have a horrible time, try reading some of the runner code. It's early 2010s-style Windows-First, MSFT C# crud that has trouble not racing several threads to inconclusive status codes.

Yes. That was my impression too. Github Actions aren't a good product in many ways. It's also very complex and requires quite a bit more infrastructure than the rest of Github. Unfortunately, I don't think that the commercial side of the product would allow it to improve in the direction of better quality / uptime. It's cursed to be forever like MS Outlook: whenever it changes it's for the worse, even though it was n…

More literally a Microsoft product. As in, rebadged Azure Pipelines.
Post reply on HN