Live data from Hacker News

The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

sfstandard.com

21–30 of 71 posts

Re: The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

#22

I feel like SF has been full of frequently inscrutable billboards as long as I’ve been coming here — at least a decade. It’s maybe got slightly more extreme recently, with an even larger percentage of them being inscrutable to me as someone who both works in tech and has a decent grasp of current industry trends. I’ve never really got it — if even I don’t know what you’re advertising (or often, who is advertising!),…

Keep in mind that marketing is not just trying to teach you about someone you're unaware of, but is also in part about assuring you (and your boss) that you're about to make the right choice when their sales team is already talking to you, and even in part about ensuring that you (and your boss) continue to feel confident that you did make the right choice (or alternatively make you have doubts about having picked the competitor) after you made the buy.

Making their sales peoples job easier, in particular, can be a lot cheaper than getting the marketing on its own to sell someone on you. They want you to go "oh, yes, FooBar Inc, I recognise that name" instead of your reaction being "who?!?".

A lot of marketing without calls to action fall in the latter two categories. In that case they don't need to tell you who they are. They just need you to notice that they're there enough that they seem like a player that is a good choice. You don't even necessarily want to come across as caring too much about explaining who you are - you just want to portray the silent confidence of someone buyers should already know.

(I have no idea whether the specific billboards you're talking about succeed at this)

Re: The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

#23
post #11

I saw the band Chat Pile a while back in Los Angeles. They played the previous night in San Francisco — their singer mentioned the billboards and led the crowd in an ethusiastic chant of "F*k AI!".

I didn’t ever expect to see Chat Pile mentioned here. Their music captures this sentiment perfectly though.

Re: The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

#24

I feel like SF has been full of frequently inscrutable billboards as long as I’ve been coming here — at least a decade. It’s maybe got slightly more extreme recently, with an even larger percentage of them being inscrutable to me as someone who both works in tech and has a decent grasp of current industry trends. I’ve never really got it — if even I don’t know what you’re advertising (or often, who is advertising!),…

I remember seeing an advertising exec talk about spending more money in the area the execs lived so they felt the impact of the advertising, regardless of how effective the spend actually was. This is likely more of the same - making the investors and C-Suite get warm fuzzies.

Re: The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

#25
They’re tacky, but I appreciate how clearly it homogenizes what is being pitched globally as some unique thing that only a few big companies do, or that it’s magic. Like the other thread on Vegas casino adverts… It’s big, it’s annoying, and if they’re going to survive (casinos get demolished/sold/bankrupted), lasting differentiation requires more than just sparkly lights, an AI feature, and a VC-subsidized advertising budget.

Re: The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

#26
"Killing SF" is overly dramatic, and others have noted that the phenomenon observed here is not unique to AI, or SF.

But there is something a little...alienating about advertising that's not meant for you.

It's a dumb example, but in Pittsburgh the football stadium was renamed from Heinz Field to Acrisure Stadium.

Of course, "Three Rivers Stadium", the name of the previous building, was best. It's not a name that tries to sell you something. But if you must sell something, "Heinz" is extremely good: it sells products for everyone, and it has historical roots in the area. Of the people, for the people.

But Acrisure? I've looked it up a few times and I still can't remember exactly what it is. Business services or insurance or something like that. And I'm sure that both Acrisure and the Steelers don't really care that I don't know what it is, because it's not really for the vast majority of the 65,000 people who show up on a Sunday to cheer for the team.

That's...weird.

Re: The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

#27

I feel like SF has been full of frequently inscrutable billboards as long as I’ve been coming here — at least a decade. It’s maybe got slightly more extreme recently, with an even larger percentage of them being inscrutable to me as someone who both works in tech and has a decent grasp of current industry trends. I’ve never really got it — if even I don’t know what you’re advertising (or often, who is advertising!),…

In the SF tech scene they talk about this -- startups say they will put up a billboard for one CTO.

I don't even think that's an exaggeration. I watched a YouTube video about a startup that wanted to land a major client, figured out the CTO's commute, and put up billboards along the way.

Then they called the guy and he told them "I see your ads everywhere." They had an in.

The economics likely make sense when a contract is easily worth tens of millions of dollars. They're trying to create the perception that they're established in the mind of one person.

Re: The AI Billboards Are Killing SF

#30
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't in california, actually. While you can generally restrict new ones, you can't eliminate existing ones without basically paying out the lost revenue+etc to whoever is running it.

Ban new ones and that will naturally go extinct

There's been a moratorium on new billboards in SF for a long time already. No new ones are getting built. Given the reliable revenue they provide, will be a long time before they naturally go extinct.
Post reply on HN