Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One thing I fear is going to happen when more and more people use LLM's for coding is that they will default to the "average taste" of the LLM, and we will stop getting new interesting ideas about how to build things. It is a possibility. But I also think we're underestimating the human need to create cool, unique things. Like yes most of the projects in this situation will have "average taste" but most of the proj…
> But I think it is a bit of an overblown fear that LLMs will just kill creativity and innovation in coding. Hackers will be hackin Hacking and a taste for hacking is a muscle you develop. LLMs will make most people not train it at all. Same way a huge number of people are obese and out of shape. For LLMs to be bad news in this regard, it doesn't matter if some people will still find a way to do something creative. A…
And I don't under the fat and out of shape part of the comment. Being in shape and being good at coding are not equal things in many aspects:
1. Most people learn code for employment. Most people get fit for personal reasons.
2. It takes considerable physical effort to get in shape. Getting good at code requires considerable mental effort but it is a very different form of effort.
You can claim LLMs will make people dumber and lazy. But that doesn't mean working out and being fit = being really good at computers in real life.
Lastly, you seem to have a cynical view of the world and believe in a merit-based structures but most people don't generally become super fit or hackers. Its always a small percentage of the population in general and most likely will always be. It is debatable if the availability of an LLM can reduce them to 0.