Terafab
terafab.ai
Terafab
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Terafab
#2It's no longer Mars, it's the Galaxy. Must be a prank site?
Re: Terafab
#3[dead]
Re: Terafab
#4Dr. Tom Murphy seems highly relevant here.
https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/10/the-energy-trap/
also: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambitions
Re: Terafab
#5Site is legit - https://www.tesla.com/careers/search/?department=terafab&sit...
I wouldn't be surprised if it's another Musk pump-and-dump scheme for SpaceX. We'll be seeing more of these every quarter now.
Re: Terafab
#6At one point people stop believing in these grandiose marketing stunts. I hope the time is now.
Re: Terafab
#7For anyone out there who might know:
To achieve a Type II civilization, is a Dyson Swarm currently the best theoretical approach or are there others that are more promising?
Re: Terafab
#8The scale of this thing seems science fictional.
https://x.com/ChrisJBakke/status/2085519392285380966
That's 15 Pentagons.
Re: Terafab
#9> 10 Million Tons of mass/year launched into orbit
Not something to be proud of...
Re: Terafab
#10> Cost of compute on Earth
Power build
Permitting
Operating costs
Land
Energy costs
Infrastructure
Cooling
> Cost of compute in space Launch cost
Operating costs
Satellite build
Infrastructure
I thought it was pretty hilarious that they removed "cooling" as a requirement for orbital compute when it's actually way harder to keep something cool on a satellite than on earth. There is no matter floating around in orbit to dump heat into...