Earlier quoted context omitted.
An important feature of taste is also that it is highly variable between people, and because there is no system or proof of good taste, we cannot really say that one person's taste is objectively better than another's. This is what causes one person to build a large software system in a classical OOP language while another builds almost the same system in a typed functional language, each following their own internal…
> because there is no system or proof of good taste, we cannot really say that one person's taste is objectively better than another's We can't say it in times of a general culture of confusion, like now. In times when there was an established cultural and artistic hierarchy, they could.
Taste Is All That's Left
391–400 of 573 posts
Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#392Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But I think it is a bit of an overblown fear that LLMs will just kill creativity and innovation in coding. Hackers will be hackin Hacking and a taste for hacking is a muscle you develop. LLMs will make most people not train it at all. Same way a huge number of people are obese and out of shape. For LLMs to be bad news in this regard, it doesn't matter if some people will still find a way to do something creative. A…
It is exactly like that. Yes, there are exercise nuts who are exercising like crazy, but the average population is getting weak and obese. The same with mental muscles. How many people can do mental calculations in their head nowadays? What about remembering several phones numbers? What about simply navigating with map but without GPS? (Or, heaven forbid, just by common sense and observation?) Properly thinking about…
Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#393Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#394Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#395On the topic of taste, I think of this quote in Susan Sontag's "Notes On 'Camp'" often: “For taste governs every free — as opposed to rote — human response. Nothing is more decisive. There is taste in people, visual taste, taste in emotion — and there is taste in acts, taste in morality. Intelligence, as well, is really a kind of taste: taste in ideas. (One of the facts to be reckoned with is that taste tends to deve…
I'm a little confused. She follows describing people with good/bad taste immediately with the statement that there is no system for taste. If it is all relative, then how is she determining that someone has good or bad taste? Is there anything between moral relativism and mathematical proof? Just your own ineffable belief that you are right?
And I think taste is subjective by definition, it doesn't compete with "objective taste" because that makes no sense.
Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're here, because even "bad" code has uses. We can have quantity over quality. We can generate throw-away programs (where the lack of maintainability doesn't matter). We can solve some problems by brute force (keep trying until tests pass). For people who can't program, even bad code can do more than no code. LLMs are also useful as a natural language interface. They're pretty useful for search (as RAG and autore…
> They're here, because even "bad" code has uses. We can have quantity over quality. We can generate throw-away programs (where the lack of maintainability doesn't matter). We can solve some problems by brute force (keep trying until tests pass). For people who can't program, even bad code can do more than no code. If this is an acceptable definition of software engineering productivity, where "quantity over quality"…
However, look at history of DSLR cameras vs mobile phone cameras. Mobile phones were always worse than large format cameras, and we've got a massive quantity-over-quality explosion in photos taken. It didn't replace professional photography, but let people upload photos of their lunch to social media.
I think in programming we're getting frustrated because we're trying to naively use high-volume low-quality code generators in our previous low-volume high-quality workflows. We're still discovering what's the programming equivalent of bathroom selfies, photos of receipts and QR codes.
Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
> because there is no system or proof of good taste, we cannot really say that one person's taste is objectively better than another's We can't say it in times of a general culture of confusion, like now. In times when there was an established cultural and artistic hierarchy, they could.
Was it objectively correct or was it just the king's taste?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumptuary_law
not kings per se, maybe sultan, or the royal court, roman senate, etc.
Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#398On the topic of taste, I think of this quote in Susan Sontag's "Notes On 'Camp'" often: “For taste governs every free — as opposed to rote — human response. Nothing is more decisive. There is taste in people, visual taste, taste in emotion — and there is taste in acts, taste in morality. Intelligence, as well, is really a kind of taste: taste in ideas. (One of the facts to be reckoned with is that taste tends to deve…
I'm a little confused. She follows describing people with good/bad taste immediately with the statement that there is no system for taste. If it is all relative, then how is she determining that someone has good or bad taste? Is there anything between moral relativism and mathematical proof? Just your own ineffable belief that you are right?
Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#399Hard disagree on "Good enough", most things are mediocre at best. Despite the massive AI boom I can at best count on one hand "fresh" products made with AI that are meaningful in day-to-day usage. Not to mention most of them seem to be targeting AI-space itself instead of bridging some actual business use case. Just look at all the products on ShowHN, you can "tell" a vibed product in seconds.
You are using countless products that are built or have become maintained by AI without realizing it apparently.
Re: Taste Is All That's Left
#400On the topic of taste, I think of this quote in Susan Sontag's "Notes On 'Camp'" often: “For taste governs every free — as opposed to rote — human response. Nothing is more decisive. There is taste in people, visual taste, taste in emotion — and there is taste in acts, taste in morality. Intelligence, as well, is really a kind of taste: taste in ideas. (One of the facts to be reckoned with is that taste tends to deve…
I'm a little confused. She follows describing people with good/bad taste immediately with the statement that there is no system for taste. If it is all relative, then how is she determining that someone has good or bad taste? Is there anything between moral relativism and mathematical proof? Just your own ineffable belief that you are right?