Someone tell me how it would be "in the public interest" to allow one owner to control more than 50% of the market.
What’s good for Trump is good for the US.
US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
11–20 of 24 posts
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#12How does a commission override a congressional ruling though? Seems like the "checks" part of the "balances" is a bit out of balance.
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#13TV is dead so who cares if it consolidates. In fact, consolidation is probably the only way it staves off complete collapse for a few extra years. The average age of a Fox News, CNN or MSNBC viewer is 60+. The median 20 year old NEVER watches TV.
You can watch tv programs via streaming services. Youtube ABC News channel has 16.7 million subscribers. Clips of those shows can be found all over social media. There's a reason the current administration wants consolidation. It's to control the narrative. The same reason their rich supporters buy up news media companies.
There are independent YouTube channels routinely pulling 10x prime time ABC News numbers. Not just 1 or 2, more like thousands. The world has moved on.
I mean you can blatantly see who's watching this garbage by tuning in. The primetime ads are adult diapers, dementia pills and retirement financial products.
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#14TV is dead so who cares if it consolidates. In fact, consolidation is probably the only way it staves off complete collapse for a few extra years. The average age of a Fox News, CNN or MSNBC viewer is 60+. The median 20 year old NEVER watches TV.
Check out these 2 maps: https://nitter.space/ettingermentum/status/20852027930783992... Measurable, double digit swings based on which counties got TV ads in a $70m vs $10m spending campaign.
Seems totally legit!
Harris+Biden spent $770M on TV ads while Trump spent $350M.
How about 2016? Clinton spent $400M on TV ads while Trump spent $125M.
How'd that go for them? Really seeing those double digit improvements.
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Check out these 2 maps: https://nitter.space/ettingermentum/status/20852027930783992... Measurable, double digit swings based on which counties got TV ads in a $70m vs $10m spending campaign.
Seems totally legit! Harris+Biden spent $770M on TV ads while Trump spent $350M. How about 2016? Clinton spent $400M on TV ads while Trump spent $125M. How'd that go for them? Really seeing those double digit improvements.
Different campaigns, you're comparing a presidential general election to a senate primary.
You're also ignoring superpacs in those presidential runs. You know how many NRA sponsored ads about "her emails" I saw in 2016?
TV is far less dead than often assumed.
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#16Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#17Does it really matter anymore? How many people get their news and entertainment from local TV stations?
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#18Does it really matter anymore? How many people get their news and entertainment from local TV stations?
A majority of voters, apparently.
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#19Does it really matter anymore? How many people get their news and entertainment from local TV stations?
>Does it really matter anymore?
If it didnt matter, they wouldn't be changing the rules to consolidate power.
Re: US agency ends 39% household cap on local TV station owners
#20Brendan Carr is a dummy (TM)
gregorian chanting intensifies