Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
notes.secretsauce.net
Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#2https://web.archive.org/web/20240621094642/https://www.proje...
The most surprising one to me is: Least Remote: Kansas (0.8 miles from a road).
As someone who lives in the very densely populated greater Boston area, Kansas doesn't exactly strike me as a prime candidate for not being able to get away from roads.
Their website seems to have been commandeered by some Indonesian online casino scam thing in late 2024 and is now offline. I'm unsure of the ongoing state of the project.
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#3This reminds me of something I saw on a backpacking blog sometime last year. Project Remote, a family that's finding and hiking to all the "most remote" place in each state of the USA. Here's some of the statistics: https://web.archive.org/web/20240621094642/https://www.proje... The most surprising one to me is: Least Remote: Kansas (0.8 miles from a road). As someone who lives in the very densely populated greater B…
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#4Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#5This reminds me of something I saw on a backpacking blog sometime last year. Project Remote, a family that's finding and hiking to all the "most remote" place in each state of the USA. Here's some of the statistics: https://web.archive.org/web/20240621094642/https://www.proje... The most surprising one to me is: Least Remote: Kansas (0.8 miles from a road). As someone who lives in the very densely populated greater B…
Edit: they have another page describing Alaska. It seems that the linked page might only describe the contiguous US? But also, wow. This seems stupid:
> Thoughts of roadless Alaska came to mind and our amazing, wild trek through the Brooks Range of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. We hired a bush plane to drop us off in a nameless valley. At 50 miles from the nearest village or road, we were awed with excitement and healthy fear. We agreed to meet up 9 days and 35 miles later at a flat spot where he could land on the tundra marked by a heap of moose antlers. He looked at us awfully cock-eyed when we told him we had no satellite phone. He asked, “well, why not?” We told him that we were deliberately here to remove ourselves from civilization and contact with it. Watching our pilot fly away, we realized we were as far from towns and roads, and therefore, humans as we could possibly imagine.
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#6I once made a similar map at work, but for the whole USA. You can view it if you use onX Hunt - called the "Roadless" layer under "Roads Trails & Rec."
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#7The path was added to OSM two years ago, which is after the analysis was done. OSM is a moving target!
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#8This reminds me of something I saw on a backpacking blog sometime last year. Project Remote, a family that's finding and hiking to all the "most remote" place in each state of the USA. Here's some of the statistics: https://web.archive.org/web/20240621094642/https://www.proje... The most surprising one to me is: Least Remote: Kansas (0.8 miles from a road). As someone who lives in the very densely populated greater B…
I'm extremely surprised that Wyoming is more remote than Alaska! I wouldn't think Alaska has that many back-country roads running through it. Edit: they have another page describing Alaska. It seems that the linked page might only describe the contiguous US? But also, wow. This seems stupid: > Thoughts of roadless Alaska came to mind and our amazing, wild trek through the Brooks Range of the Arctic National Wildlife…
*technically not remote at all in this context as they all took place on trails
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#9https://www.treehugger.com/special-places-in-the-san-gabriel...
Also probably context for many LA people, as most seem to consider those mountains a Hollywood backdrop, not a place you can be in 90 minutes from anywhere in LA (with favorable traffic).
Re: Poles of Inaccessibility in the San Gabriel Mountains (2015)
#10This reminds me of something I saw on a backpacking blog sometime last year. Project Remote, a family that's finding and hiking to all the "most remote" place in each state of the USA. Here's some of the statistics: https://web.archive.org/web/20240621094642/https://www.proje... The most surprising one to me is: Least Remote: Kansas (0.8 miles from a road). As someone who lives in the very densely populated greater B…
Well Kansas has the benefit of being utterly flat and also quite homogenous biome wise. Even though it has no people I' assuming without looking at it that the entire state has been chopped up into square mile sized squares.