Live data from Hacker News

DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

platform.deepseek.com

41–50 of 75 posts

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#41
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They were showing notices about doubling pricing during american working timezones a week ago, so it seems likely to be demand related. Their v4 flash is brilliant, and I expect they have had a huge, and expensive to handle at short notice, surge in customers as a result.

You mean Beijing working time zones?

No?

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#42
post #18

I'm using oh my pi with Kimi K3 as the planner and DeepSeek Flash 0731 as the implementer, with OpenRouter as the provider. Any suggestions for a better configuration? I mostly need Opus 4.6 + Claude Code alternative. I don't need Fable level capabilities, I add one new feature at a time and approve the code before shipping it. Then test and open a PR. Usually both Fable and Opus suggest dumb ideas but are good imple…

I have the 20x. I really never reach the limit anymore. I am a heavy user. How is that possible?

Do you import old code base or work on small greenfield projects?

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#44
post #33

I'm guessing this is almost entirely about the incredibly low cache read prices. Few have come close to them, nothing has a bigger effect on (a typical) session price, and with the price of RAM right now, they have to be the biggest pain point for them right now? A 10x increase in cache read would be a significant increase, yet would still keep them cheaper than every other provider of their model (at least based on…

I guess the low pricing was so DeepSeek could gather training material. The provider on OpenRouter indicates that data can be retained.

From the private conversation of deepseek CEO and the investors, I'm under impression that they take pride for the low API price though. So it is not only training data. If they really want the data there are many other ways to do so.

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#45
post #18

I'm using oh my pi with Kimi K3 as the planner and DeepSeek Flash 0731 as the implementer, with OpenRouter as the provider. Any suggestions for a better configuration? I mostly need Opus 4.6 + Claude Code alternative. I don't need Fable level capabilities, I add one new feature at a time and approve the code before shipping it. Then test and open a PR. Usually both Fable and Opus suggest dumb ideas but are good imple…

not related to your question directly, but noticed you mentioned oh-my-pi, can you share little bit more why you went with oh-my-pi and not install your own set of extensions? (asking because I was just looking at it to enhance my workflow, but feeling it has too many things)

It's all about trade-offs, do you want a bunch of extensions of varying quality from a bunch of developers, or do you want a bunch of extensions of varying quality from one developer?

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#46
post #32

2x DGX Spark runs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 quite well and I already reimplemented a few classical games with it in a few hours in OpenCode with minimal hand-holding. I am expecting the inference price to collapse over time and not increase, at least for models that are able to do like 95-99% of work quickly and only the most problematic parts requiring something better.

It's exciting, but that's $9k for a model that's in the ballpark of last year's frontier. For many people that's like 10 years of up-front cost in a landscape that's getting better and cheaper every week.

but compared to the $500k+ racks running the current frontier, it does give perspective.

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#47
post #18

I'm using oh my pi with Kimi K3 as the planner and DeepSeek Flash 0731 as the implementer, with OpenRouter as the provider. Any suggestions for a better configuration? I mostly need Opus 4.6 + Claude Code alternative. I don't need Fable level capabilities, I add one new feature at a time and approve the code before shipping it. Then test and open a PR. Usually both Fable and Opus suggest dumb ideas but are good imple…

Honestly, GPT 5.6 Luna is worth a look. It’s a reasonably good implementer at a small fraction of the cost. $100 buys a heck of a lot of it at API pricing.

Not sure about the OAi Pro plan, doesn’t look like the 80% Luna price slash made its way into the quota system.

You could also try tuning down the effort level on Opus. It makes a huge difference in token consumption and you might be able to get away with lower than you’ve set

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#48
- The Launch: DS 4 officially releases

- The Big Promise: Announces a major price cut for Summer 2026, powered by cost savings from a shift to Huawei chips

- The Hype Train: Launches a flash promotion cutting prices in half, follows up by announcing the 50% discount is now permanent

- The Reality Check: Summer arrives, and Huawei's chips flops

- The Retreat: Forced to quietly reorder Nvidia chips

- The Damage Control: Introduces "off peak hours" pricing to shift demand

- The Aftermath: Announces a significant price hike

Ready to IPO :^)

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#49
post #18

I'm using oh my pi with Kimi K3 as the planner and DeepSeek Flash 0731 as the implementer, with OpenRouter as the provider. Any suggestions for a better configuration? I mostly need Opus 4.6 + Claude Code alternative. I don't need Fable level capabilities, I add one new feature at a time and approve the code before shipping it. Then test and open a PR. Usually both Fable and Opus suggest dumb ideas but are good imple…

> DeepSeek Flash 0731 as the implementer

MiniMax's "token plan" ($20/mo for 1.7b tokens) is cost competitive. MiniMax M3 is equally good, if not better than DeepSeek v4, at coding: https://platform.minimax.io/subscribe/token-plan?tab=individ...

If you prefer pay-as-you-go, then Xiaomi MiMo is the only other provider with comparable models (MiMo v2.5 & Pro) that matches DeepSeek's current API rates for input/output/cache: https://mimo.mi.com/docs/price/pay-as-you-go

Meanwhile, Meta is running a 10x discount on Muse Spark 1.2 (Grok 4.5 / Sonnet 5 level model), if you opt-in to data sharing: https://dev.meta.ai/docs/getting-started/pricing-rate-limits

> I'm OK spending max $100/month on APIs, ideally with Zero data retention.

In that case, probably you'll get more out of OpenAI's coding plan, as (from what I hear routinely) the GPT 5.6 series is thrifty with token use but as smart as the Claude 5 series: https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2085083490056589784 / https://archive.vn/3VDlN

Re: DeepSeek planning to significantly raise prices

#50
I don't think you should submit links to logged-in dashboards on HN. For those who don't have a Deepseek account, this is just a banner reading:

We plan to raise the overall pricing for DeepSeek API services in the near future, with a significant increase expected. Please plan your usage accordingly. The specific pricing plan will be subject to official notice.

Post reply on HN