Earlier quoted context omitted.
Frequent minor version bumps are pretty common these days. Opus 4.7 -> 4.8 was 42 days.
Which was in itself a do-over because Opus 4.7 received a lot of bad press on suspicion of being a regression from 4.6.
Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
181–190 of 265 posts
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
I respsct the F out out you and all your work but I am completely baffled by this line of thinking, we are talking about Meta here…
I just cannot comprehend this level of corporate villainy that boils down to: Let's have two pricing levels. One will be 12.5x more expensive than the other. For the cheaper one, we will get their express permission to train models on their inputs. For the more expensive one, we will still treat their data EXACTLY the same, but we'll lie to them and say that we won't. I've checked in with legal and they raised their…
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#183It can cyberattack other companies, too: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/05/tech/meta-ai-hacking
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
I respsct the F out out you and all your work but I am completely baffled by this line of thinking, we are talking about Meta here…
I just cannot comprehend this level of corporate villainy that boils down to: Let's have two pricing levels. One will be 12.5x more expensive than the other. For the cheaper one, we will get their express permission to train models on their inputs. For the more expensive one, we will still treat their data EXACTLY the same, but we'll lie to them and say that we won't. I've checked in with legal and they raised their…
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#185Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#186Meta is offering a 10x discount on input ($0.10 vs. $1.25/Mtok) and 20x discount on output ($0.20 vs. $4.25/Mtok) if you opt in to let them train on your data. https://developer.meta.com/ai/models/muse-spark/
I actually really like that pricing strategy. It's very transparent
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#187Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Muse 1.1 performed relatively well according to benchmarks, putting it within spitting distance of the premier models. However, based on the results I got from it and the review videos I watched, it wasn’t even close. Opus 5 is incredible at making games. Almost like a generation better than other models from my experience. You won't see that if you just look at the popular benchmarks.. You have to test each model on…
> Opus 5 is incredible at making games. This is a bit vague. What sort of games with what technology?
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually really like that pricing strategy. It's very transparent
Developers on this orange site never ever learn.
Re: Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been surprised by the reception to this, as OpenAI, for a while now, has had free API usage when data sharing is enabled ( https://help.openai.com/en/articles/10306912-sharing-feedbac... )
In my experience using DeepSeek v4 Flash free tier (context size limited to ~200k), the model isn't nearly as good as the paid one for agentic coding tasks. Unsure, if that's the case with these other providers too, though I wouldn't be surprised if it indeed is.
The paid official dsv4 api already shares data with deepseek for training