Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

divingintheshallowend.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

171–180 of 223 posts

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#171

Post by lesuorac »

> Blended Exclusivity Score ... 17/4000 = 0.425%

> In a gaggle of 100 suitors, it's actually unlikely that a single one will meet all three criteria. Perfection. We now have a truly unreasonable set of standards by which to choose our dating partner.

Is it actually truly unreasonable?

Who has not seen 4000 males? Sure, you might not be able to name 4000 but that's not the criteria. You only need to learn about 1000 of them because visually you can tell the remaining 3000 are too short. And of those 1000 you only need to learn a little to tell if they're going to earn over 100k (i.e. what career path and where they rank in their cohorts).

That Blended Exclusivity Score is really a minimum so of the 170 remaining people at least 17 qualify. You don't even have to sleep with the remaining unqualified ones, make sure the lights are on and just leave if it's too short.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#172

Post by cindyllm »

lesuorac wrote: post #171

> Blended Exclusivity Score ... 17/4000 = 0.425% > In a gaggle of 100 suitors, it's actually unlikely that a single one will meet all three criteria. Perfection. We now have a truly unreasonable set of standards by which to choose our dating partner. Is it actually truly unreasonable? Who has not seen 4000 males? Sure, you might not be able to name 4000 but that's not the criteria. You only need to learn about 1000 o…

[dead]

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#173

Post by rhrhfjfjjr44 »

BigTTYGothGF wrote: post #143
rhrhfjfjjr44 wrote: post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>No one was talking about "body count" (at least not publicly) ten years ago. Why do you think that is? Our great grandfathers were practically guaranteed to be marrying virgins, while today's young men seem to consider themselves lucky if their girl is still in single figures. Things have changed, people are talking about it.

> Our great grandfathers were practically guaranteed to be marrying virgins They also walked ten miles uphill (both ways) to school every day.

[flagged]

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#174

Post by rhrhfjfjjr44 »

quickthrowman wrote: post #81
rhrhfjfjjr44 wrote: post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>No one was talking about "body count" (at least not publicly) ten years ago. Why do you think that is? Our great grandfathers were practically guaranteed to be marrying virgins, while today's young men seem to consider themselves lucky if their girl is still in single figures. Things have changed, people are talking about it.

> Our great grandfathers were practically guaranteed to be marrying virgins Lol yeah, and fetishes were invented in the 1950s. Very few people in history made it to marriage as virgins.

[flagged]

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#175

Post by rhrhfjfjjr44 »

nixon_why69 wrote: post #111
rhrhfjfjjr44 wrote: post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rich and handsome 6'4" men have no problem standing out. This is the point. Online dating does not suck for them. Your goofy friend might get lots of updoots on reddit but if he's short and broke it would be immediately reject him. They will never even see his mac and cheese bio. Online dating would be a waste of time for him at best; at worst, kiss goodbye to this delusional confidence once the crushing reality mani…

That's what I'm trying to help you understand. My goofy friend was plowing a trail of pussy through NYC at that time with his fun and confident antics. Below 6 feet and definitely not rich back then. There's a point past this where racking up a number is hollow and meaningless but that's beside the point right now. The thing I'm trying to tell you is that you can have a better and more positive personality even if yo…

Look I'm >666 but that is so outrageous I feel mad on behalf of other men. "Oh you're short and fat? Just be one of the funniest men on earth with multiple massively successful world-famous podcasts and comedy tours, bro!"

Do you think Stav would be less popular with women if he was a 10/10 physically? Of course not. In fact, he wouldn't even need to be funny. He wouldn't need to be rich. He wouldn't need to be famous.

Maybe we're arguing different things here, I don't know what's going on. I mean many women will literally set a filter so that their apps don't even show them men under six-foot-whatever. These men are invisible. Yes, as the author proves, short kings can still get it. No shit. It's not a binary: 666 or permanent incel. I know you know this so I'm genuinely confused what you're trying to argue.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#176

Post by hackyhacky »

rhrhfjfjjr44 wrote: post #173
BigTTYGothGF wrote: post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Our great grandfathers were practically guaranteed to be marrying virgins They also walked ten miles uphill (both ways) to school every day.

[flagged]

> was as ran through as your typical young woman you'll find on the apps nowadays?

I'm not saying you are one, but using this kind of language really makes you sound like a full on incel misogynist, who has sublimated his sexual frustration into antiquated paternalistic views of women's sexuality. But I'm sure that's not accurate.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#177

Post by hackyhacky »

rhrhfjfjjr44 wrote: post #174
quickthrowman wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Our great grandfathers were practically guaranteed to be marrying virgins Lol yeah, and fetishes were invented in the 1950s. Very few people in history made it to marriage as virgins.

[flagged]

> that would still make them a unicorn in the dating market nowadays.

Are you having trouble in the dating market? Perhaps you're frustrated by frequently meeting women who are experienced enough to recognize your inadequacy.

The solution is to improve yourself, not to shame women.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#178

Post by joshdavham »

So I'm an actual "6/6/6"... and I also have a statistics degree. This was absolutely hilarious to read!

I will say that I've seen multiple definitions of the 666 rule where the last 6 represents either penis length or a 6-pack. From personal experience, I will say that maintaining a 6 pack makes you much more desirable in the eyes of women than, uh, the other option.

I'm also not much of a dater, but my friends always freak out at me when I tell them I've never been on a dating app. They seem to think I'd do well. ...Maybe this is my sign that I should try a dating app?

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#180

Post by joshdavham »

exhumet wrote: post #60
SirFatty wrote: post #21

What a waste of time.

oh dont be lameeee, some people are freaks who find fun in doing math. power to em

I love seeing these types of articles on HN! I love it when someone smart actually does the math on some silly topic :D
Post reply on HN