Live data from Hacker News

Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

seattle.gov

31–40 of 157 posts

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#31
post #24
post #5

it is just getting better and better to live here in Seattle. Legalization of weed, same-sex marriage, and now high-speed internet

Fix that whole rain thing and I'll be there tomorrow.

Come on!.. it only took me 17 years to get used to the rain (Came from South America).

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#32
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That and the transportation. Otherwise, Seattle is probably the place I like to live in the states the most. The traffic and lack of good public transport options is a serious negative :(

Depends what kind of transportation, though; when I lived there, I made use of the great bicycle infrastructure[1] every day, and really loved how much better that was than any other US city I'd lived in. But yeah, the other forms of transportation (including plodding your own car through the traffic) kinda suck. [1]: https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&msa=...

Okay, if your entire route is along the Burke, bicycling is great. But if you have to go anywhere in downtown, you chose between battling cars and riding the bus. (Disclosure: I biked SODO to and from Cap hill for a while. 4th Ave during rush hour is a nightmare =).)

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#33
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally I don't want to live in Seattle because of the earthquake risk that nobody is prepared for. See http://discovermagazine.com/2012/extreme-earth/01-big-one-ea... if you don't know what I'm talking about.

I think almost every region in the country is overdue for some disaster that is predicted to happen any day now.

We have the yellowstone volcano here in Colorado...

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#34
post #24
post #5

it is just getting better and better to live here in Seattle. Legalization of weed, same-sex marriage, and now high-speed internet

Fix that whole rain thing and I'll be there tomorrow.

Yep. I have an internship there this summer, and I'll be moving from Calgary, which gets the most hours of sunlight of any city in Canada. Hope the change won't be too jarring/depressing... it was overcast every day when I was there for interviews.

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#35
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That and the transportation. Otherwise, Seattle is probably the place I like to live in the states the most. The traffic and lack of good public transport options is a serious negative :(

Depends what kind of transportation, though; when I lived there, I made use of the great bicycle infrastructure[1] every day, and really loved how much better that was than any other US city I'd lived in. But yeah, the other forms of transportation (including plodding your own car through the traffic) kinda suck. [1]: https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&msa=...

Biking in Seattle is great in some areas, horrid in others. Plus, HILLS.

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#36
post #5

it is just getting better and better to live here in Seattle. Legalization of weed, same-sex marriage, and now high-speed internet

The bad thing about WA state is the tax structure -- no corp or personal income tax (good), but the B&O tax is a gross receipts tax, really complex (it varies by county and by type of business), and has pyramiding (as do all gross receipts taxes) -- it's equivalent to a 12-15% corp income tax for many businesses. If you don't use 2-3 levels of contractors, or have a lot of work done as subassemblies, it should be ok -- for a software/internet startup who buys hosting from a single provider only, it is probably more like a 3-4% income tax.

It's still better overall than most states, but I'd prefer a different corporate income tax structure. Even a 5-10% corporate income tax, with no minimum, would be fine. The worst part about California corporate taxes is the $800 minimum; if you got rid of that, it would be pretty reasonable I think.

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#37

I'm moving to Seattle in January and was already planning to sign up with CondoInternet. Seeing as my to-be neighborhood is one of those they say this will be offered in, I'm now wondering when this will be rolled out. Awesome news though. Edit: "Gigabit Squared will be aggressively building, with eyes towards beginning services in the Fall of 2013."

If you have the option for condointernet, go for that. By far the best option in Seattle.

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#38
post #8
post #5

it is just getting better and better to live here in Seattle. Legalization of weed, same-sex marriage, and now high-speed internet

Private health insurance sucks ass in WA, but other than that it does look good :)

WA doesn't seem worse than anywhere else -- $118 for a 33yo male for HSA compatible. All the quotes I've seen for individual health insurance in WA are good, and they have a lot of the "good" features of ObamaCare already.

Re: Seattle to deploy Gigabit fiber network

#39
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally I don't want to live in Seattle because of the earthquake risk that nobody is prepared for. See http://discovermagazine.com/2012/extreme-earth/01-big-one-ea... if you don't know what I'm talking about.

We've been prepping for "the big one" for generations. Many have become complacent. We're more worried about earthquakes causing a "lahar" mud slide off Rainier and plowing through lowlands. Evacuation drills are down to about 4.5 minutes. Earthquakes are a good reason not to live anywhere on the Pacific coast. Hurricanes are a good reason not to live in the southeast, or apparently, New Jersey. And I don't want to l…

We've been prepping for "the big one" for generations.

I absolutely know this to be false.

I grew up just north of you in Victoria. I was a teenager when they began piecing together evidence that earthquakes of that magnitude actually could hit the area. Before then there was no thought to preparation. And large parts of my home town are still on landfill, close to sea level. (Which is not what you want during an earthquake...)

Earthquakes are a good reason not to live anywhere on the Pacific coast.

The earthquake risk in California is well-understood and the area is prepared for it. That risk is quite acceptable to me. The Pacific Northwest is less prepared, and has the potential for an earthquake over 10x bigger than anything that California has to worry about.

That article is just more FUD, designed to be fed to people who enjoy being afraid. There's no new knowledge there.

It was one of the top links when I searched for "Cascadia superfault". I did not research it carefully. I would not expect it to contain novel information.

Post reply on HN