Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

techpowerup.com

21–30 of 50 posts

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#21

Spyware and bloat ain't cheap these days. Linux users don't rejoice too much, the Fedoras and Ubuntus were eating so much of my RAM I had to take refuge in Alpine.

CachyOS was using 3.25gb of ram while streaming video at 4k on my system. My Windows work PC is currently using 28.2 gigs to have outlook, teams and 6 browser tabs open.

Is it actually using it though or is most of it just cached stuff?

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#22
post #17

This recommendation was targeted to gaming, not office work. And even for gaming, MSFT said 16GiB was good enough for most games. Sensationalist article which doesn’t belong on HN.

Gaming is such a broad category. That said not even modern triple A games recommend 32 gigabyte yet.

There are games which have long recommended 32GiB, but primarily simulators.

DCS and MSFS 2024 are two such examples.

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#23
My Windows 11 laptop with 32 GB RAM only allows for about 10-12gb user addressable before starting to crash. I do keep a lot of Chrome tabs open so that can easily get to 6-8gb, plus IntelliJ can use another 4-5. Add on VScode, sometimes Firefox or Opera, an email client, some other utilities (or god forbid try opening WSL), and I'm constantly getting crashes. And as I stated, only about 12gb of applications on a 32gb machine. It makes no sense.

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#24
After purchasing a brand new pre-built from Microcenter (mostly for the GPU & RAM inside), I didn't even boot the Microsoft garbage – started straight into Ubuntu 26 USB installer, formatted, and was up and running immediately. Now this new 5070Ti purrs more-happily...

Sillily, the RGB-bullshit 32GB RAM sticks were cheaper than identical unlits... but I do wish I'd paid more for the latter now, because I'm going to [eventually] have to get inside of these stupid gimmicky LED-covers and tear them all directly off the PCB – so fucking stupid [RGB hardwired onto RAM is, without a physical switchoff].

----

tl;dr: I don't care what Microslop does or does not recommend, because I would never in my lifetime be caught using anything post-Win7Pro (if it had to be MSFT).

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#25

Spyware and bloat ain't cheap these days. Linux users don't rejoice too much, the Fedoras and Ubuntus were eating so much of my RAM I had to take refuge in Alpine.

> ... the Fedoras and Ubuntus were eating so much of my RAM I had to take refuge in Alpine ...

The name of the bloat you're looking for is called "systemd".

Even though it's still kinda, sorta, possible to keep a lean Debian install in check (and Debian by default uses systemd), systemd is quite the gigantic kitchen sink. In the Fedoras and Ubuntus it's indeed out of control now.

The one thing that speeds up a systemd Linux booting (and usage) is removing as much of those systemd (dis)services as possible.

P.S: main desktop is Debian + Awesome WM (so I do use systemd)

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#26
post #17

This recommendation was targeted to gaming, not office work. And even for gaming, MSFT said 16GiB was good enough for most games. Sensationalist article which doesn’t belong on HN.

Wasn't it actually talking about if you were gaming and streaming your gameplay and chatting at the same time?

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#27
Genuine question, especially here on HN. Why would a developer use Windows in 2026?

I even develop windows apps. On Linux, built on GitHub actions.

If I had windows forced on me for corp reasons, like I did once, just full screen a VM

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#28

Genuine question, especially here on HN. Why would a developer use Windows in 2026? I even develop windows apps. On Linux, built on GitHub actions. If I had windows forced on me for corp reasons, like I did once, just full screen a VM

Because the IT department makes them. Windows (and Mac) have an abundance of turn-key MDM solutions. I did the research to avoid having to use Windows at a previous employer, and there weren't many options (and specifically _any_ that covered 100% of what they wanted).

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#29

Genuine question, especially here on HN. Why would a developer use Windows in 2026? I even develop windows apps. On Linux, built on GitHub actions. If I had windows forced on me for corp reasons, like I did once, just full screen a VM

Developing apps for platform you are not using is just pointless exercise in frustrating your users. If app fails on Windows, how are you going to support your users? You don't have Windows, so you are unable to replicate the error at a first place.

Re: Microsoft Is Quietly Deleting Mentions of 32 GB RAM Recommendation for Win 11

#30

Had a laptop purchased in December 2024 with 16 GB of RAM. Running a single VS Code instance and Edge with maybe 10 tabs consumed almost 100% of the RAM. Doing any actual development work required me to upgrade to 64 gigs of RAM. Thankfully it required DDR4 SODIMMs and I had two lying around from a recently deceased Mini PC.

I am in this bucket too. MSSQL + VS + tested Server + tested Client on 16GB + Win11 will just choke MSSQL server into constant timeouts. But if I will offload MSSQL onto another computer everything works just fine.
Post reply on HN