Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
1–10 of 60 posts
Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#2Are we though?
Thank god corporate profits are ok...
Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#3I can't help but shake the feeling that the federal reserve is here for the wealthy, the bankers, and not for the rest of us, and anything they do is ultimately not for our benefit, but for theirs.
Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#4Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#5> Corporate earnings are through the roof. They’re doing great. The consumer is hanging in there. The labor market is hanging in there. Are we though? Thank god corporate profits are ok...
- US Presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, 2011
Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#6Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#7> Corporate earnings are through the roof. They’re doing great. The consumer is hanging in there. The labor market is hanging in there. Are we though? Thank god corporate profits are ok...
Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#8Yen carry trade unwind, inflation in Japan, hit to the NASDAQ, AI bubble pops, Japanese investors pull money back home and Treasuries lose its largest foreign creditor. Who knows what happens next.
Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#9Rates up, rates down, I'm so confused. Too much liquidity supposedly means inflation, too little liquidity means deflation. Would not lower rates mean more consumer spending, thereby injecting more spending and fluidity in the system? I can't help but shake the feeling that the federal reserve is here for the wealthy, the bankers, and not for the rest of us, and anything they do is ultimately not for our benefit, but…
Re: Fed's Kashkari says 'now is the time to start slowly moving' rates up
#10Rates up, rates down, I'm so confused. Too much liquidity supposedly means inflation, too little liquidity means deflation. Would not lower rates mean more consumer spending, thereby injecting more spending and fluidity in the system? I can't help but shake the feeling that the federal reserve is here for the wealthy, the bankers, and not for the rest of us, and anything they do is ultimately not for our benefit, but…
You're making a lot of strong assertions for someone who acknowledges they don't understand pretty basic concepts in macroeconomics.
> Would not lower rates mean more consumer spending, thereby injecting more spending and fluidity in the system?
If managing the economics of a country was as simple as recognizing a relationship like, "when we move this number up, then things get better," then we'd be living in a utopia.
If you want to assert that the Fed isn't helping the average citizen, then go ahead and join the large group of people who have been suggesting this the whole time. But if your basis for such an assertion is that you can't comprehend why a decision like raising or lowering interest rates isn't simple, then do yourself a favor and just step away from even trying to understand what is happening here.