Live data from Hacker News

Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

divingintheshallowend.com

121–130 of 223 posts

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exact opposite of the point they made, brother. Worth a reread and think depending on your headspace.

Guys let’s not pretend that him being taller and more stereotypically handsome would’ve hurt his “achievements”. It would’ve of course helped. The fact that height and stereotypical beauty standards are not the only things that matter does not change that on average they have a significant positive impact.

[deleted]

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#122
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Guys" that follow 6-6-6? This is a dating rule by women for women, not guys.

Smells more like a dating rule by guys who think this is a dating rule by women.

I believe it came from a womens' dating forum. Now do most women seriously follow it? Almost certainly not but I don't know any blokes that care about this rule. Why would they?

Are you the type of person that believes only men can say foolish things?

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is nowhere in the known universe where the average woman is taller than the average man. Therefore, women will tend to select mates who are taller than themselves. It’s not a cultural phenomenon, it’s universal.

Counterpoint: Anglerfish

Wonder if there any guys who are therians and identify as male anglerfish:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therian_subculture

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exact opposite of the point they made, brother. Worth a reread and think depending on your headspace.

Guys let’s not pretend that him being taller and more stereotypically handsome would’ve hurt his “achievements”. It would’ve of course helped. The fact that height and stereotypical beauty standards are not the only things that matter does not change that on average they have a significant positive impact.

The point is that stereotypical beauty standards, while they matter, they matter less than one would think when it comes to a hetero man approaching a hetero woman.

Give women some credit. Confidence and fun are way better heuristics than a strong jawline on a neurotic wreck. They are smarter than men socially, on average, so any theory should account for that.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#126
post #97
post #90

I understand that at the every end he acknowledges this is dumb, but I think the biggest issues faced by guys who follow that 6-6-6 rule is that they are immature.

"Guys" that follow 6-6-6? This is a dating rule by women for women, not guys.

... I mean, realistically it sounds like the sort of thing that only teenage and young adult men would believe in. What makes you think that women subscribe to it?

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#127

I am curious why is height important? Understandably, income affects the lifestyle and opportunities, but what does height affect? What changes if you are several inch taller or shorter? I cannot understand. Also, why those who care about height so much do not go for basketball players? Also, the picture with income graph says "household income", not "personal income".

For one, because it's an indicator of health and healthy development, which are in turn related to other desirable features. Analogous things can be said for women. You also can't ignore assortive mating. We're not all in the same mating pool, as it were. Women prefer men taller than they are , but that doesn't mean that a woman of 1.25m will pair with a man of 2m. The typical height difference between husband and wi…

I've seen plenty of evidence that goes against this. From what I have seen, short women will absolutely prefer a man who is taller than other men, regardless of their own height, so something does not add up. In fact, I've seen it often be the other way around; a man will sometimes prefer a woman who is not a midget compared to himself, purely for practical reasons (unless of course he falls in love).

I will go as far as to say that assortative mating is likely a side-effect of people ending up in the same or similar socioeconomic circles, but that is just me reaching. In reality I would guess that it's a bit of that, and being used to people from a certain "class".

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#128
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Smells more like a dating rule by guys who think this is a dating rule by women.

I believe it came from a womens' dating forum. Now do most women seriously follow it? Almost certainly not but I don't know any blokes that care about this rule. Why would they? Are you the type of person that believes only men can say foolish things?

Okay, so someone said something silly on a dating forum once. But the question is who, if anyone, actually _believes_ in it.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#129
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Guys" that follow 6-6-6? This is a dating rule by women for women, not guys.

... I mean, realistically it sounds like the sort of thing that only teenage and young adult men would believe in. What makes you think that women subscribe to it?

[deleted]

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The answer is "evolved intuition", like it or not. Maybe. A lot of what we assume are innate sexual preferences are actually determined socially. No one was talking about "body count" (at least not publicly) ten years ago. These days, a full-figure on a woman is considered attractive, but in the 1990s, being skinny was in vogue. Insofar as an attractive partner is a status symbol, the definition of "attractive" cha…

>These days, a full-figure on a woman is considered attractive, but in the 1990s, being skinny was in vogue. This is usually based on a selective and wishful interpretation of historical data. The best argument I've found is here - https://www.jsanilac.com/dispelling-beauty-lies/

The article is too long. Judging about beauty standards by using sex dolls as an example is not very smart, first, because they are targeted to a small niche audience with specific tastes, second, they do not look especially attractive in the photos in the article. Also the font is awful and a pain to read.
Post reply on HN