Live data from Hacker News

Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

divingintheshallowend.com

91–100 of 223 posts

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#92
Putting on my atheist hat for a minute, I think these statistics are interesting in reminding people that there is an underlying biological and evolutionary process underlying mate selection. You’re being evaluated for biological fitness criteria.

That said, individual chemistry is highly variable so these particular criteria are just a proxy and negotiable. Don’t take stated criteria at face value. My now wife’s type was chubby 6-foot plus midwestern future lawyers. But then she met a 5-9 Bangladeshi in law school and got baby fever and that was that. My personal view of it is God has a plan for all of us, but if you’re an atheist you can see it as the chemistry of biological compatibility being highly complex and individualized.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#93
And here I was shocked and really happy to hear about Three 6 Mafia on HN.

Fun fact: Three 6 Mafia used to be Triple 6 Mafia, they changed their name to be "radio friendly" (Three Six Mafia rolls off easier than Triple Six Mafia) after signing a record deal.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#94
post #61

When I read articles like this, they're so far removed from how me and my male friends interact that I find it hard to believe.

You’re not alone. Most people know a funny person, and someone good with numbers, but it’s less often the same person. You could analyze that with the techniques from the article. :)

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#96
post #90

I understand that at the every end he acknowledges this is dumb, but I think the biggest issues faced by guys who follow that 6-6-6 rule is that they are immature.

Guys don't follow that rule (unless they are gay), they worry about women following it. It appears to be originating from a post on the (rather toxic and apparently now defunct) reddit sub /r/FemaleDatingStrategy many years ago, but apparently is still being brought up.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>These days, a full-figure on a woman is considered attractive, but in the 1990s, being skinny was in vogue. This is usually based on a selective and wishful interpretation of historical data. The best argument I've found is here - https://www.jsanilac.com/dispelling-beauty-lies/

I was alive in the 1990s. "Heroic chic" was definitely a thing. I'm also alive now. It's not hard to find big butts being idolized. Your linked article is not very scientific. For example, it cites porn-store purchasing preference as evidence of actual male taste in partner selection.

>Your linked article is not very scientific.

That's the whole point. Due to the touchiness of the subject matter, these kinds of topics would be quite difficult to discuss frankly in a politicized institution guarded by a peer review process.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#99
post #2

The information that was missing from my life: For the Average Man, gaining an inch of height is worth losing roughly $25k in annual salary. Meanwhile, an inch of pecker is roughly offset by reducing annual salary by $128k.

So smaller penises are rewarded with higher salaries?

Something to bring up with your manager for the next salary review.

Re: Three Six Mafia – Data about "6/6/6 dating" (2024)

#100
post #97
post #90

I understand that at the every end he acknowledges this is dumb, but I think the biggest issues faced by guys who follow that 6-6-6 rule is that they are immature.

"Guys" that follow 6-6-6? This is a dating rule by women for women, not guys.

Smells more like a dating rule by guys who think this is a dating rule by women.
Post reply on HN