Earlier quoted context omitted.
I took their point to be about wifi being jammable
Yeah first thing burglars are gonna do is jam your wifi camera so you don't have any video of them. Run cat-5 and get a PoE camera.
Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
21–30 of 103 posts
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#22Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thread is fairly similar to Zigbee, just standardized and doesn't require brand specific hubs. You can actually control thread devices direct from an iphone with no hub at all. Wifi for anything but cameras is a mistake, it only exists for maximum compatibility since everyone has wifi already.
> Wifi for anything but cameras Buttons (key presses, remotes - think rapid input), Knobs, sliders, Pixel LED' strips, some MM wave sensors, ir/radio transmitters, really need wifi. There is products where you will want a bluetooth proxy, plenty of kitchen/grill thermometers and scales for kitchen and bathroom are great examples. Where range is an issue LoRa is a thing that has plenty of devices and is easy to DIY.
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#24I’m a bit surprised they didn’t add zwave into this comparison.
Doesn't zwave use a different frequency, and zigbee and thread are both 2.4ghz? Perhaps that makes it a more fair comparison?
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- microwave ovens
Additionally, it’s a bit more strict with certification so you can easily use multiple vendors for zwave whereas with zigbee it’s often a terrible experience since vendors implement things differently in ways that are not as interoperable. In fact, for a device to be certified by the zwave alliance, it must pass strict conformance testing to ensure backwards compatibility and interoperability.
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, you have to order it from Mouser for $16 instead. Fixed link: https://www.mouser.com/en/ProductDetail/Nordic-Semiconductor... And there’s a little configuration: https://wiki.makerdiary.com/nrf52840-mdk-usb-dongle/guides/n...
Dead product link
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there a situation in which your smarthome taking 30s to recover from a node failure is impacting your life? Seems like a distinction without a difference
Standing outside with an armfull of groceries, and a door is now our of range of your hub temporarily due to the failed node. 30s can seem like quite a while standing in the rain.
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#27I’m a bit surprised they didn’t add zwave into this comparison.
https://www.home-assistant.io/connect/zwa-2/
https://www.getzooz.com/zooz-zst39-z-wave-long-range-usb-sti...
the zooz is this internally: https://www.silabs.com/wireless/z-wave/800-series-modem-soc/...
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#28A lot of graphs where OpenThread & zigbee dance around each other, are within 2x of each other. Two huge notables to me: message throughput for openthreads scales up, zigbee seems to hit a wall early. Not sure when that matters but very clear. The last table was a fright through: it takes half a minute for OpenThreads to recover after a node drops where-as Zigbee a quarter second! Wow.
Is there a situation in which your smarthome taking 30s to recover from a node failure is impacting your life? Seems like a distinction without a difference
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#29I’m a bit surprised they didn’t add zwave into this comparison.
yes, and also that if someone is buying stuff new, it should be exclusively zwave800 stuff. example hardware on the "hub" end would be: https://www.home-assistant.io/connect/zwa-2/ https://www.getzooz.com/zooz-zst39-z-wave-long-range-usb-sti... the zooz is this internally: https://www.silabs.com/wireless/z-wave/800-series-modem-soc/...
Re: Zigbee vs. Matter over Thread:Understanding IoT Protocol Performance in Practice
#30I’m a bit surprised they didn’t add zwave into this comparison.
yes, and also that if someone is buying stuff new, it should be exclusively zwave800 stuff. example hardware on the "hub" end would be: https://www.home-assistant.io/connect/zwa-2/ https://www.getzooz.com/zooz-zst39-z-wave-long-range-usb-sti... the zooz is this internally: https://www.silabs.com/wireless/z-wave/800-series-modem-soc/...