Surprisingly low hype for a company running perhaps the most advanced consumer-interactive robots. I’m quite fond of these machines and will periodically rescue them when someone has misused them (door not closed, most commonly). Hope they do well. Very good road participants.
I want trains.
Waymo in Dallas
221–230 of 751 posts
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stop spreading FUD. The police do not in any meaningful way "have access" to Waymo cameras. They can subpoena recordings and Waymo will call the cops on you if you commit a crime in one of their cars, but your statement implies Flock-like access which the police simply don't have.
https://gizmodo.com/waymos-driverless-cars-revealed-to-be-na...
> Waymo does not provide information or data to law enforcement without a valid legal request, usually in the form of a warrant, subpoena, or court order.
Waymo is no more required to turn over data to the government than you are.
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#223I'm just curious how it works on the legal side: if a human run the red light he gets a fine, who gets fined with a waymo car? If the car I'm in cause a big damage or kill someone? I guess the damage will be paid by the insurance but whom insurance? Mine or waymos? And what about criminal implications? Insurance doesn't cover thoose for sure.
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#224Why are the cars so big? Wouldn't it make sense to have a bunch of much smaller, single person vehicles?
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
> When a robot car messes up, who is held responsible? The company owning and operating the robot?
Ah yes, can’t wait to sue Google on equal monetary and political footing. It will be very easy, and very fair. /s
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
> that big companies are (sometimes) bound by the same laws that bind the rest of us Not if they’re stupid laws!
Even then. There is value in uniform rule of law.
Sure. OP's point is these products and investments are accruing disproportionately to red cities and states. Sinking together isn't a great pitch.
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
Divide this differently: - states where the major cities commonly have snow for > 3 months - states where the major cities commonly have snow for Inclement weather is likely the differentiator. Blue state California gets Waymo in its biggest cities, which handily do not get much snow. The other Waymo cities are all below the Mason-Dixon Line.
Blocked even from testing in NYC. Blocked from DC and Boston. Unfortunately this does have more to do with bad government than bad weather.
A government that listens to the people it governs is a good government.
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
>and cause WAY fewer traffic incidents than human drivers. Ironically the best way to verify this is that when they do cause traffic issues, it becomes national news. Imagine breaking down and blocking an intersection in Edgewood Georgia, and then getting a call that night from your Uncle in Oregon saying he saw your breakdown on the news...
There was a story here about it hitting a child (I think) but it was determined to be much less serious than if a human driver was involved
Re: Waymo in Dallas
#229I live very close to LAX, and we have hundreds of Waymos in our area. At first i was a little weary, and kinda weirded out by all of them. They have become completely normal, and cause WAY fewer traffic incidents than human drivers. They are very predictable, and will always let you pull in front of them when changing lanes (unlike a lot of other LA drivers). I have seen a few incidents where they seem 'stuck', and i…
I can’t wait for broader adoption of self driving cars.