What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
1–10 of 88 posts
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#2ai drivel, sadly / humorously
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#3> More than half of the decline came from a statistical correction to the population level in January and from the steady effects of an aging population, not from workers exiting the labor market. But part of the decline is due to June’s sharp drop in the participation rate among workers ages 25 to 54.
> While dramatic, the June drop brings the participation rate among these prime-age workers back to a level consistent with those of recent years.
nothing to note unless it continues to drop
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#4> More than half of the decline came from a statistical correction to the population level in January and from the steady effects of an aging population, not from workers exiting the labor market. But part of the decline is due to June’s sharp drop in the participation rate among workers ages 25 to 54. > While dramatic, the June drop brings the participation rate among these prime-age workers back to a level consiste…
Considering the prior years were Covid, and the obvious scale tipping from the gov’t? Yeah right.
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#5maybe it was that 90% of all hiring in 2020-2024 was foreigners thing?
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#6> Still, this rate merits carefully watching in coming months; a continued decline may signal a deeper change in the behavior of workers in this critical age group.
I know I'm speaking from a rather (somewhat) privileged position. I myself don't consider working beyond 50 years of age. I have lived frugally/minimally and am confident that (unless WW3 happens or some sort of unexpected global catastrophe arrives) I can FIRE (retire frugally with my savings) before I hit 50.
I also know it's somewhat of a bubble, but Reddit has a lot of subreddits (like r/HENRYfinance/; r/Fire/; and r/coastFIRE/) dedicated for folks retiring early.
Observing that FIRE trend and the fact that AI psychosis (don't get me wrong, I believe AI is useful, but not to a level that humans will be entirely replaced) at work place will surely drive some folks away (or at least discourage them) from staying in the work force, I am not surprised that this trend is showing up in the data. Plus, a lot of millennials are child free (by choice), so they can afford to retire early as well.
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#7ai drivel, sadly / humorously
Pangram gave 95% human for the chunk (1,547 words) that I gave it. Part of a single paragraph was listed as AI.
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#8maybe it was that 90% of all hiring in 2020-2024 was foreigners thing?
What changed in June?
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#9Anecdotal evidence, but more than half of my friends that grew up:
1. middle upper class
2. college educated at a top 75 college
3. tall, decent looking
are just not working regular corporate 9 to 5s and get by with consulting, small businesses, living off parents, living off nothing, scammy startups
w2 9-5 is straight up not worth it, even in the 150-300k range
Re: What's Behind the Sharp Drop in Labor Force Participation?
#10Anecdotal evidence, but more than half of my friends that grew up: 1. middle upper class 2. college educated at a top 75 college 3. tall, decent looking are just not working regular corporate 9 to 5s and get by with consulting, small businesses, living off parents, living off nothing, scammy startups w2 9-5 is straight up not worth it, even in the 150-300k range
how are any of those premises connected to the conclusion?