Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
1–10 of 42 posts
Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#2Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#3Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#4Sigh. So this is somewhat interesting niche academic research but utterly irrelevant to real-world use cases.
Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#5Unsure if it's LLMs that fail at tabular data or its just that tree boosting are spectacular at that task.
Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#6Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#7Unsure if it's LLMs that fail at tabular data or its just that tree boosting are spectacular at that task.
https://research.google/blog/introducing-tabfm-a-zero-shot-f...
Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#8>We study a frontier LLM in its purest inference regime - a single generation pass over a prompt containing the full training and test data, with no tools, no agentic scaffolding, and no fine-tuning Sigh . So this is somewhat interesting niche academic research but utterly irrelevant to real-world use cases.
Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#9>We study a frontier LLM in its purest inference regime - a single generation pass over a prompt containing the full training and test data, with no tools, no agentic scaffolding, and no fine-tuning Sigh . So this is somewhat interesting niche academic research but utterly irrelevant to real-world use cases.
Re: Why Large Language Models Fail at Tabular Prediction
#10You’ve got to be kidding me. That one variable could make a huge difference in the results. I can’t understand why they would leave that out.