Am I crazy if for something like an online purchase, I kind of expect it to take a second or two to process the payment, so I would assume something went wrong if it was 200ms?
200 Milliseconds
21–30 of 114 posts
Re: 200 Milliseconds
#22Re: 200 Milliseconds
#23This is magnificent! Gave me roller-coaster ride across 40 years of gathering knowledge about computers and networks. I'm very jealous of whoever created that. Well done!
Homer explains it best https://youtu.be/Tmx1jpqv3RA
Re: 200 Milliseconds
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I learned three thresholds over the years. Well, one of them decades ago and the others recently. Basically: At 50ms, you notice. At 400ms, you care. At 2000ms, without output, you wonder if it crashed. (That was the old one.)
> At 2000ms, without output, you wonder if it crashed. (That was the old one.) That must have been a really, really long time ago indeed, because there are very few websites now that take less than 2000ms to load. The linked site didn’t even come close on my phone (probably 3-4 seconds), and I most certainly didn’t wonder whether it had crashed.
Re: 200 Milliseconds
#25Am I crazy if for something like an online purchase, I kind of expect it to take a second or two to process the payment, so I would assume something went wrong if it was 200ms?
Your comment reminded me of when Google introduced "Instant Search" in 2010. Here's an old HN thread from the launch: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1672391
Re: 200 Milliseconds
#26Am I crazy if for something like an online purchase, I kind of expect it to take a second or two to process the payment, so I would assume something went wrong if it was 200ms?
Re: 200 Milliseconds
#27Am I crazy if for something like an online purchase, I kind of expect it to take a second or two to process the payment, so I would assume something went wrong if it was 200ms?
Re: 200 Milliseconds
#28Am I crazy if for something like an online purchase, I kind of expect it to take a second or two to process the payment, so I would assume something went wrong if it was 200ms?
Your comment reminded me of when Google introduced "Instant Search" in 2010. Here's an old HN thread from the launch: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1672391
Re: 200 Milliseconds
#29200ms is insane, 50ms is the goal. But really, great page. Someone new could learn from it the basics of what to check when debugging web.
The US is so big, that 50 ms is physically not possible for everyone. This is something that not everybody is aware of. When I as a German build something for germans, everyone who needs to wait longer than 100 ms for a request, is rightfully mad. But when I want to serve the same stuff to americans at the same speed, I have to build something completely different and much more complex.
Somewhat ironic, given how many contracts here seem to come with 3 months notice periods.