Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Containers Preview

blog.mozilla.org

131–136 of 136 posts

Re: Firefox Containers Preview

#131
oAuth is still painful with containers:

1. Set a domain to always open in a container

2. Click login with Google which redirects to another container

3. oAuth handshake is done which redirects to website 1

4. Handshake fails because of authorization_code mismatch

You could argue that you shouldn't be using oAuth if you care about privacy but it would be nice if it could be handled.

Re: Firefox Containers Preview

#132
post #19

Multi-Account Containers paired with Container Proxy allows for some really cool setups. I especially like the options to use socks proxies. Hope they will add proper proxy support later.

> the options to use socks proxies I pair it with wireproxy [0]. This way you can assign any Wireguard-capable VPN for specific containers. It's extremely useful. [0] https://github.com/windtf/wireproxy

Managed to get up and running quickly with this and https://github.com/pia-foss/manual-connections for Private Internet Access.

    WGConfig = "/etc/wireguard/pia.conf"

    # Socks5 creates a socks5 proxy on your LAN, and all traffic would be routed via wireguard.
    [Socks5]
    BindAddress = 127.0.0.1:25344

Re: Firefox Containers Preview

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As mentioned, each profile launches in its own window. I use different themes for each so they are visually distinct. And different home pages, etc. I could use different shortcuts for different identities, but I don’t any more. Instead about:profiles is one of my home page tabs for each profile.

That sounds like a lot of configuration to carry around.

Bits don't weigh very much and fit in a convenient laptop shaped carrying case.

It also has the advantage of working the way I expect when I want to do the things I use it to do.

Do containers do that?

Re: Firefox Containers Preview

#135

I’ve been using Firefox Containers for years through Mozilla’s Multi-Account Containers extension.[1] Now that container management is available directly in Firefox, I’d prefer to use the native implementation if possible. Mozilla notes that the extension still adds some functionality: > “Installing the Multi-Account Containers extension developed by Mozilla provides a few benefits on top of the native container func…

I use the proxy feature extensively as a network administrator, it is quite frequent that I need to SSH tunnel to get to the Web UI of a remote resource (for security or at least as often to bypass a routing deficiency I am troubleshooting) and before Multi-account Containers I'd basically have to fire up a completely different browser since the proxy settings I use would control every tab and every site I tried to reach.

With Multi-account containers I get to choose which tabs use the proxy :)

Re: Firefox Containers Preview

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That sounds like a lot of configuration to carry around.

Bits don't weigh very much and fit in a convenient laptop shaped carrying case. It also has the advantage of working the way I expect when I want to do the things I use it to do. Do containers do that?

That's a tough question to answer because you haven't clearly stated your requirements. It makes it very easy for you to prove that something doesn't work while making it very difficult for someone else to prove it does.

What I meant about configuration is that the onus is on you to manage all of that. I know some people love that level of control but most people it's a burden. Containers are part of your profile and move with you if you're using Firefox Sync. You don't have to copy or maintain multiple profiles or Sync accounts.

Post reply on HN