I have not been following this very closely but it seems like the source of this cyclospora contamination has been very challenging to identify. Especially because it takes weeks before the infected start showing symptoms. Isn't it reasonable to update the official statement as new information emerges? "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” -John Maynard Keynes.
[flagged]
Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
51–60 of 283 posts
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder how high the ongoing implementation cost of that would be and how that would affect choice between small, specialized and large, integrated suppliers. Sysco can probably hand me a single sheet I can use without any extra work.
I think if you watch video of a massive meatpacking plant, you'll pretty quickly realize how hard it would be to track. At the commodity scale, basically no one in the supply chain other than the rancher seems to care where the meat comes from. And the brands (Tyson, Smithfield, etc.) only want consumers to care about the logo on the box. Literally the canonical example of capitalism-as-meat-grinder.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#53I was always under the impression that disease and pesticide don't usually just "wash off" at home.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#54Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#55I went to restaurant last night and asked where the chicken was sourced from and their response was "it's not the usual place we get chicken, but it's US Farm Raised Hatched", but I misinterpreted the her answer as a distributor name but then I realized even if I had a name, I probably couldn't figure out past that whether or not these chickens were pasture raised. If food labels are law, why doesn't this apply to wh…
Restaurants don't even have to track and disclose what allergens their food contains.
https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/campaign-2026/allergie...
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are food labels required to identify where they're sourced from? I don't think so?
It’s not but they should list country of origin for the ingredients
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#57Marketing blogspam by an ambulance chasing attorney who stands to make a lot of money from this if public perception moves a certain way.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#58Marketing blogspam by an ambulance chasing attorney who stands to make a lot of money from this if public perception moves a certain way.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#59It's next level for a family owned company act like they have stock holders to please by cutting corners rather then doing the right thing.
Re: Taylor Farms has rewritten its cyclospora statement four times in sixteen days
#60I went to restaurant last night and asked where the chicken was sourced from and their response was "it's not the usual place we get chicken, but it's US Farm Raised Hatched", but I misinterpreted the her answer as a distributor name but then I realized even if I had a name, I probably couldn't figure out past that whether or not these chickens were pasture raised. If food labels are law, why doesn't this apply to wh…
Restaurants don't even have to track and disclose what allergens their food contains.