ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
1–10 of 137 posts
Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#2Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#3Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#4Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#5Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#6Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#7IF there was a secure and trustable way that a trusted government could retain DNA information, then I feel like people having a DNA test at birth or on becoming a citizen could be useful, both medically ("your sample indicates you may have a higher risk of dementia") and from a policing standpoint ("we found DNA on this woman's clothes and immediately matched it to this man who hasn't committed a crime before" or "w…
Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#8IF there was a secure and trustable way that a trusted government could retain DNA information, then I feel like people having a DNA test at birth or on becoming a citizen could be useful, both medically ("your sample indicates you may have a higher risk of dementia") and from a policing standpoint ("we found DNA on this woman's clothes and immediately matched it to this man who hasn't committed a crime before" or "w…
Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#9Re: ICE Collected Nearly 1M People's DNA Last Year–Including Young Children
#10IF there was a secure and trustable way that a trusted government could retain DNA information, then I feel like people having a DNA test at birth or on becoming a citizen could be useful, both medically ("your sample indicates you may have a higher risk of dementia") and from a policing standpoint ("we found DNA on this woman's clothes and immediately matched it to this man who hasn't committed a crime before" or "w…