Earlier quoted context omitted.
:) wait until somebody read it.. its one vibe coding session away from done..
I've LOLed too but just an idea of a router FW in a memory safe language... is awfully convincing.
Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
21–30 of 30 posts
Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've LOLed too but just an idea of a router FW in a memory safe language... is awfully convincing.
router7 [1], written in Go, might interest you. [1] https://router7.org
Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can use snap or brew or build from source?
snap is a Ubuntu thing, nobody else uses it. Even Ubuntu users don't want to use it. Nobody uses brew outside MacOS. tio is in the AUR. Recent controversies aside, it's as easy as installing a regular package. But maybe GP doesn't have 10GB to install the entire build chain.
Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#24Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#25Presently it seems to be unlikely to find an inexpensive ( I settled for a MikroTik model when replacing my mom's router. It almost fits the criteria. I can even port forward via SSH on it. The one thing it won't do natively? IPv6 6RD, the cursed legacy ISP junk CenturyLink has for IPv6 on DSL or, according to some posts I encountered looking for a solution, their rare fiber runs. So now it has a script I found onlin…
However due to the price (Depending on availability in the 2nd hand market, it's very possible to get tri-band 11be routers for USD$50-100, usually with one or two 10GBaseT interfaces), there are still quite a few that overlook some of the difficulties involved.
> triggered to run every 10 seconds because the PPPoE interface doesn't provide an 'on change' event hook.
Normally this should be handled by a hotplug.d script in /etc/hotplug.d/ but I'm not familiar with the stock Mikrotik firmware.
Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#26Presently it seems to be unlikely to find an inexpensive ( I settled for a MikroTik model when replacing my mom's router. It almost fits the criteria. I can even port forward via SSH on it. The one thing it won't do natively? IPv6 6RD, the cursed legacy ISP junk CenturyLink has for IPv6 on DSL or, according to some posts I encountered looking for a solution, their rare fiber runs. So now it has a script I found onlin…
I wanted Wifi 7e recently (upgraded to really fast fiber) and went with Ubiquity for that.
I did find the Totolink X5000R extremely good. 50€, WiFi 6 on both bands, fast. But I couldn't find a 7e upgrade I would be happy with.
Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#27Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#28Presently it seems to be unlikely to find an inexpensive ( I settled for a MikroTik model when replacing my mom's router. It almost fits the criteria. I can even port forward via SSH on it. The one thing it won't do natively? IPv6 6RD, the cursed legacy ISP junk CenturyLink has for IPv6 on DSL or, according to some posts I encountered looking for a solution, their rare fiber runs. So now it has a script I found onlin…
Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can use snap or brew or build from source?
snap is a Ubuntu thing, nobody else uses it. Even Ubuntu users don't want to use it. Nobody uses brew outside MacOS. tio is in the AUR. Recent controversies aside, it's as easy as installing a regular package. But maybe GP doesn't have 10GB to install the entire build chain.
Point being: their "architecture" is not preventing them from installing
Also: i have no qualms with snap. Genuinely don't get the hate.
Re: Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
snap is a Ubuntu thing, nobody else uses it. Even Ubuntu users don't want to use it. Nobody uses brew outside MacOS. tio is in the AUR. Recent controversies aside, it's as easy as installing a regular package. But maybe GP doesn't have 10GB to install the entire build chain.
You can run snaps wherever you want. Brew is available for Linux. Point being: their "architecture" is not preventing them from installing Also: i have no qualms with snap. Genuinely don't get the hate.
While that is technically true, snaps are very much build for ubuntu. For example it's sandboxing relies on apparmor meaning on distro without it such as archlinux, there is no confinement or security advantage.
Meanwhile flatpak is an actual distro agnostic containerized package management system using namespaces and seccomp available everywhere. Its infrastructure is also officially self hostable unlike snaps.