I love ssh apps! See also late.sh, and my own https://shellbox.dev
Show HN: ssh ssh.place
31–40 of 126 posts
Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#32Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#33Time for your regular reminder that ssh has no PKI and is trivial to mitm during tofu.
Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#34Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#35Hey, is it not just a simple honeypot reverse hack ssh server? People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?
No, actually, I've never heard of such a vector. How would that work?
Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#36Time for your regular reminder that ssh has no PKI and is trivial to mitm during tofu.
ssh server keys can be authenticated using (the DNSSEC "CA" system and) SSHFP, and it's possible to setup a signing CA for the host key (similar to ssh certificates, however not applicable for foreign servers). And of course, the fingerprint could be advertised out of band e.g. on the homepage with tls
Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#37Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#38Hey, is it not just a simple honeypot reverse hack ssh server? People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?
> People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right? No, actually, I've never heard of such a vector. How would that work?
Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#39Hey, is it not just a simple honeypot reverse hack ssh server? People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?
> People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right? No, actually, I've never heard of such a vector. How would that work?
For example, openssh has both a client and server. There’s been vulnerabilities in openssh, in the client. Those vulnerabilities aren’t reachable unless you’re connecting to a server attempting to exploit you, so the risk is quite low because you know and trust most servers you’re connecting to with ssh.
To sum it up: Connecting to this server is probably fine, but in doing so most people are doing something significantly riskier without realizing it.
Re: Show HN: ssh ssh.place
#40Hey, is it not just a simple honeypot reverse hack ssh server? People understand that reverse hacking can happen when connecting to random ssh server, right?
Is that more likely than getting hacked when visiting a website?