Live data from Hacker News

AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

mitsloan.mit.edu

381–390 of 443 posts

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#381

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please link the relevant law that makes it illegal to be homeless in texas.

https://legaloverview.com/is-it-illegal-to-be-homeless/

Thank you for ignoring the request and not providing the simple link i requested.

Also, from your own link:

>Is It Illegal to Be Homeless

>No US law makes the status of being homeless a crime. You cannot face arrest simply for not having a permanent address or for being unable to afford rent.

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#382
post #18

Financial advice for most people is incredibly straightforward and it can be summed up as: cut expenses and invest conservatively. Cutting expenses is the absolutely best thing you can do because it gives you more money to save AND reduces how much money you need to survive in retirement. Drive a 2007 Camry instead of buying a new F150 every 2 years. Live in a small as space as possible. Don't buy designer whatever.…

"Cut expenses and invest conservatively" isn't a plan. It's good advice, yes, but it isn't a real plan and it won't lead to better outcomes for the user. the user won't feel any accountability or progress this way. With AI we can personalize everything efficiently.

At Pendragon we're not here to nag users (we have an anti-Karen clause in our constitution) we're here to help them achieve their goals responsibility and set up a sound plan best for their situations. Whether that's buying a house, a new boat, or saving for college, we help users achieve their goals safely and efficiently.

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#383
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you only have a fixed amount of money to put aside every month, DCA makes sense. That applies to 99% of people. Not terrible at all.

That's not really DCA, at least how I understand it. DCA is something like "I have $520,000 in cash right now today sitting in checking, I'm going to buy $10,000 a week of VTSAX for the next 52 weeks" which on average is a bad strategy. What you're describing is better analyzed as a continuing series of lump sum investments. You're investing as soon as you have cash available, not unnecessarily holding onto cash.

Bad strategy? Or on average not optimal?

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#384
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not OP, but I think they are referring to the fact that you can get tax advantaged accounts instead of a standard savings account. Not to mention the interest rate on those accounts is basically a rounding error.

A child can not get a tax advantaged account. You need earned income to contribute to those.

If you track chores you can actually set up your kids with a Roth 401k. For example, this company takes care of it for you https://www.halfmore.co/

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you're missing the point why younger people do that. Real wages have been deteriorating over the years. It's much more difficult to afford a house today than it was 50 years ago. People are perfectly aware that investing into index funds is the "correct" approach, however it does not solve anything for them. They're desperate and for them _to gamble_ seems like the only way to become decently rich allowing to…

Yes. You used to start at -1000 points and earn 5000 over your life. With investment and luck you could make that 10000 and end up at +9000. Now you start at -9000 and earn 3000. With investment and luck you could make that 6000 and end up at -3000 so that's still a guaranteed loss. To have any hope of hitting the positives at all, you need to excessively gamble. Sure you could end up at -999999 (which is no worse th…

Yep, that's a nice illustration. Basically, if to continue steady leads to an inevitable loss, then _to gamble_ is actually a rational decision. You can see that in chess a lot: if someone is down a pawn, they have to take more risks if they need to win

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are you talking about? What is “rent”? You can rent an individual room. You can rent a double-wide trailer. You can move to Kentucky. You can work 40 hours (guaranteed 40-50k year). > stop responding to all incentives and deliberately go against the grain of every system and form of aid. Yep, that’s a pretty unique kind of person.

I'm talking about this scenario we are discussing, where someone saves money by not paying rent. Which kind of homeless will they be?

Saves money by not renting? This sounds like an Upper class 20 year old activity. Are they not renting a trailer so they can put $200/month in Tesla?

The level of discipline and focus to be that kind of super saver doesn’t sound like the origin story of a guy with a shopping cart.

Another aspect that gives ms pause is living in ann unmaintained apartment where you don’t have insurance etc is miserable. And that’s the reality of being poor. I’m not sure why we need to pretend we can all become homeless when the actual danger is already real and bleak.

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I use YNAB I was happy to pay for YNAB4, which was local-only data. I have no interest in paying a subscription for YNAB5 when I have no need for cloud-access or cross-device syncing. If YNAB5 was one-time purchase plus optional syncing, I'd consider the one-time outlay.

I use YNAB4 to this day and the cross-device sync still works

[deleted]

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#388
post #15

The hard part is behavioural/emotional/psychological rather than technical. Usually discussions about money are never actually about money, but rather safety, fear, etc. That’s where a real advisor earns their keep. Understanding the client and instilling confidence/comfort.

I have had a financial advisor for a while now. (Did and does handle my dad as well.)

Costs a bit of money but he probably does some things with his brokerage's computers that I don't have easy access to and, with one exception, I've consolidated a number of accounts to him--a couple of which I barely looked at. He's also good as a sounding board. I'll sometimes push back if I have a slightly different view of risk/return for some things but I mostly take his advice both for managed accounts and one I directly control at a different brokerage.

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://legaloverview.com/is-it-illegal-to-be-homeless/

Thank you for ignoring the request and not providing the simple link i requested. Also, from your own link: >Is It Illegal to Be Homeless >No US law makes the status of being homeless a crime. You cannot face arrest simply for not having a permanent address or for being unable to afford rent.

Yeah but you can't sleep outside of a home, so good luck with not sleeping for the rest of your life.

Re: AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions

#390

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you’re a layman investor just dump all of your shit in index funds. Even if you’re smart and sophisticated, you’re still competing against the massive amount of fraudulent insider trading happening right now with zero enforcement and are trading at a disadvantage as a result

I think you're missing the point why younger people do that. Real wages have been deteriorating over the years. It's much more difficult to afford a house today than it was 50 years ago. People are perfectly aware that investing into index funds is the "correct" approach, however it does not solve anything for them. They're desperate and for them _to gamble_ seems like the only way to become decently rich allowing to…

Real wages are higher today than they ever have been. The whole story about median real wages falling is entirely a result of Simpson’s paradox as applied to women entering the workforce from 1970-2000. This sort of axe grinding is just excusing people’s bad decisions it isn’t grounded in reality.
Post reply on HN